Jump to content

User talk:Lexus18: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9)
 
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
|}<!-- Template:Teahouse_invitation -->
|}<!-- Template:Teahouse_invitation -->
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:3}}|[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]}}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:3}}|[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]}}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->

== Edit to the Steampunk article ==
I've removed your edit from the [[Steampunk]] page because it appears to be advertising. Please feel free to discuss this with me on my talk page if you feel I
have done so in error, and that this book is notably relevant to Steampunk. [[User:Holzman-tweed|Holzman-Tweed]] ([[User talk:Holzman-tweed|talk]]) 16:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:52, 22 November 2017

Your submission at Articles for creation: Once Upon A Time Slip (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 02:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Lexus18, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to the Steampunk article

I've removed your edit from the Steampunk page because it appears to be advertising. Please feel free to discuss this with me on my talk page if you feel I have done so in error, and that this book is notably relevant to Steampunk. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]