Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Kumar Das: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
Yes, Vijay Kumar Das is senior journalist and often appears in televisions for debates.
Yes, Vijay Kumar Das is senior journalist and often appears in televisions for debates.
[[Special:Contributions/156.149.249.10|156.149.249.10]] ([[User talk:156.149.249.10|talk]]) 13:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/156.149.249.10|156.149.249.10]] ([[User talk:156.149.249.10|talk]]) 13:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

I strongly believe that we should Keep the profile. I have added the references/citations from the existing Wikipedia articles.
[[Special:Contributions/171.48.29.107|171.48.29.107]] ([[User talk:171.48.29.107|talk]])

Revision as of 17:55, 29 November 2017

Vijay Kumar Das

Vijay Kumar Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable person, no reliable sources found. HINDWIKICHAT 14:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. HINDWIKICHAT 14:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. HINDWIKICHAT 14:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Rosoft I would strongly recommend raising this at SPI. I'm getting a strong suspicion you are right. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 16:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Vijay Kumar Das is an influential person in Bhopal region. 122.172.186.92 (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Vijay Kumar Das is senior journalist and often appears in televisions for debates. 156.149.249.10 (talk) 13:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly believe that we should Keep the profile. I have added the references/citations from the existing Wikipedia articles. 171.48.29.107 (talk)