User talk:Yashovardhan Dhanania: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit |
m Reverted 1 edit by 74.50.208.108 (talk) to last revision by MediaWiki message delivery. (TW) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| archiveheader = {{tan}} |
| archiveheader = {{tan}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
I'm blocked person. |
|||
{{talk header|bottom=yes|disclaimer=no|arpol=yes}} |
{{talk header|bottom=yes|disclaimer=no|arpol=yes}} |
||
Line 18: | Line 14: | ||
{{TOC right}} |
{{TOC right}} |
||
<!--go to the bottom--> |
<!--go to the bottom--> |
||
== 16:23:58, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Scholarinchief == |
== 16:23:58, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Scholarinchief == |
||
{{Lafc|username=Scholarinchief|ts=16:23:58, 12 April 2017|declined=Draft:The_Man_Who_Knew:_The_Life_and_Times_of_Alan_Greenspan}} |
{{Lafc|username=Scholarinchief|ts=16:23:58, 12 April 2017|declined=Draft:The_Man_Who_Knew:_The_Life_and_Times_of_Alan_Greenspan}} |
Revision as of 13:39, 18 December 2017
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is Yashovardhan Dhanania's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
Article policies
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
16:23:58, 12 April 2017 review of submission by Scholarinchief
Hi there,
Not sure what the problem is here? I have cited reviews in the Economist, the Financial Times, and the New York Times? These are real reviews, not mentions. Could you please clarify the issue?
Thanks!
DRN volunteer roll call
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys