User talk:Yaris678

Spatial visualization ability

Hey! I've fulfilled your request at Spatial visualization ability way back in September 2015 for a more reliable source. The subject of the article has come up quite a bit recently in relation to Google's leaked 'anti-diversity' memo, and I think it's important that Wikipedia has a good article on the subject, so if you have any further suggestions I'd appreciate them. :) TheDragonFire (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd completely forgotten that I had edited that article!

No new suggestions to make, but there are still some inline tags in the article. I would be most concerned about the "citation needed" and the "not in citation given".

Yaris678 (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yaris678. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Racial hygiene

Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Please do not revert my removal of your edits again.

Further, I see no consensus on the talk page for the edits you made. I have asked there that you provide specific rationales for your removal of the information you did, clarifying why you think it is "off-topic". Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't see the point in this message. It might be best to keep the discussion on the article talk page. Yaris678 (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Sexual Offenders in the Magic the Gathering Judges Program

I noticed that is section was taken away from the Magic the Gathering wiki page due to untrustworthy\poor sources, I think this second needs to be there (Assuming it has good sources and not vandalism). However, with a lock that is possible. Is there a circumstance this is section is being blocked because people within the community don't like who broke the story? Wizards of the Coast, Judges Program, Channel Fireball, etc have already released official statements on the matter.

—Terps2008 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 16 January 2018‎ (UTC)

I was the one who protected the page and I don't know who broke the story, so it is probably best to stay away from conspiracy theories about why the page was protected.

If this subject is covered by reliable sources, it is OK for it to be in the article. Your account has been around long enough that you will be able to edit the article. Of course, on a subject like this, different people will have different opinions on what is reliable and on the best way to summarise what the sources say. Therefore, it would be sensible to discuss the sources and what you think the article should say before adding anything to the article. Certainly, if you add something and it is removed, don't put it back - discuss it and see what other editors think should be said on the subject. The best way to start a discussion it is to start a new section at Talk:Magic: The Gathering and give link(s) to the source(s) you think are reliable.

One last thing, when you post a comment, add four tildes - ~~~~ - that adds a signature on the end of the comment, like my one below. The slightly different looking one above is one I added for you.

Yaris678 (talk) 11:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I will ping the admin's and see what they think, thank you for the advice! ~~~~

Weird, it does not look like it adds a signature? —Terps2008 (talk • contribs)

Page protection

Thanks for the page protection on Rashid Khan (Afghan cricketer) - it was next on my list to request at WP:RPP. Thanks again! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 15:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

No worries. TripleRoryFan got to RfPP first. Yaris678 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)