Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.codes (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* '''Redirect''' as above, seems a good idea, certainly better than the current situation. [[User:Ильина Оля Яковна|Ilyina Olya Yakovna]] ([[User talk:Ильина Оля Яковна|talk]]) 21:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC) |
* '''Redirect''' as above, seems a good idea, certainly better than the current situation. [[User:Ильина Оля Яковна|Ilyina Olya Yakovna]] ([[User talk:Ильина Оля Яковна|talk]]) 21:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
*Why would any editor intentional reference an external link on a Disambiguation page? |
|||
[[User:Habatchii|Habatchii]] ([[User talk:Habatchii|talk]]) 23:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:22, 27 January 2018
- .codes (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't see how this would be useful. None of the items listed are named ".codes". feminist (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Feminist: They are all codes of some sort, what is the deletion rationale? Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Feminist: The .codes is a TLD designation, so it would be the prerogative of the domain name holder. A complete listing of .codes websites can be generated in any Internet statistics site, Googled or secured via any search engine. The usage of the TLD is not limited to one field or science, the major theme is codes and coding. Habatchii (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Code (disambiguation), though a deletion would be reasonable as well. There's nothing there which is ".codes", just a few arbitrary terms with the word "Code" in them. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:48, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect as above, seems a good idea, certainly better than the current situation. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why would any editor intentional reference an external link on a Disambiguation page?