Euro convergence criteria: Difference between revisions
TheMadBaron (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 283: | Line 283: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
<small> |
<small> |
||
<sup>1</sup> Current EU member states that have not yet adopted the |
<sup>1</sup> Current EU member states that have not yet adopted the mosh, candidates and [[Enlargement of the European Union#Potential Candidate countries|official potential candidates]].<br> |
||
<sup>2</sup> No more than 1.5% higher than the 3 best-performing EU member states.<br> |
<sup>2</sup> No more than 1.5% higher than the 3 best-performing EU member states.<br> |
||
<sup>3</sup> No more than 2% higher than the 3 best-performing [[European Union|EU]] member states.<br> |
<sup>3</sup> No more than 2% higher than the 3 best-performing [[European Union|EU]] member states.<br> |
Revision as of 14:20, 20 October 2006
Convergence criteria, also known as the Maastricht criteria, are the criteria for European Union member states to enter the third stage of European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and adopt the euro. The four main criteria are based on Article 121(1) of the European Community Treaty. Those member countries who are to adopt the euro need to meet certain criteria which include:
1. Inflation rate: No more than 1.5 percentage points higher than the 3 best-performing member states of the EU (based on inflation).
2. Government finance:
- Annual government deficit:
- The ratio of the annual government deficit to gross domestic product (GDP) must not exceed 3% at the end of the preceding fiscal year. If not, it is at least required to reach a level close to 3%. Only exceptional and temporary excesses would be granted for exceptional cases.
- Government debt:
- The ratio of gross government debt to GDP must not exceed 60% at the end of the preceding fiscal year. Even if the target cannot be achieved due to the specific conditions, the ratio must have sufficiently diminished and must be approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace.
3. Exchange rate: Applicant countries should have joined the exchange-rate mechanism (ERM II) under the European Monetary System (EMS) for 2 consecutive years and should not have devaluated its currency during the period.
4. Long-term interest rates: The nominal long-term interest rate must not be more than 2 percetage points higher than the 3 best-performing member states (based on inflation).
The purpose of setting the criteria is to maintain the price stability within the Eurozone even with the inclusion of new member states.
Fulfilment of criteria
Convergence criteria | Obligation to adopt 4 | Target date | Euro coins design | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country 1 | Inflation rate 2 | Government finances | ERM II membership | Interest rate 3 | set by the country | recommended by the Commission | |||
annual government deficit to GDP | gross government debt to GDP | ||||||||
Reference value 5 | max 2.6% | min. -3% | max. 60% | min. 2 years | max 7.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
United Kingdom | 2.2% | 0 years | opt-out | conditional | NA | NA | |||
Denmark | 2.1% | joined ERM II on 1 January 1999 | opt-out | not yet set | NA | NA | |||
Sweden | 0.5% | 0 years | yes | not yet set | NA | none yet | |||
Slovenia | 2.3% | -1.9% | 29.4% | joined ERM II on 28 June 2004 | yes | 2007 | yes | ready | |
Estonia | 1.3%[citation needed] | +1.8% | 4.9% | joined ERM II on 28 June 2004 | yes | 2008 | TBA | ready | |
Cyprus | 2.4% | -4.1% | 71.9% | joined ERM II on 2 May 2005 | yes | 2008 | TBA | in progress | |
Malta | 0.4% | -5.2% | 75% | joined ERM II on 2 May 2005 | yes | 2008 | TBA | ready | |
Latvia | 2.9% | -0.7% | 14.3% | joined ERM II on 2 May 2005 | yes | 2008 | TBA | ready | |
Lithuania | -1.2%[citation needed] | -2.5% | 19.7% | joined ERM II on 28 June 2004 | yes | 2009 | TBA | ready | |
Slovakia | 2.7% | -3.3% | 43.6% | joined ERM II on 28 November 2005 | yes | 2009 | TBA | ready | |
Bulgaria | 4.6% | 3.1% | 29.9% | 0 years | 3.8% | yes | 2009 | NA | in progress |
Czech Republic | 2.9%[1] | -3% | 37.4% | 0 years | yes | 2010 | NA | in progress | |
Hungary | 4.7% | -5.4% | 60.4% | 0 years | yes | 2010-2014 | NA | in progress | |
Poland | 0.7% | -6.8% | 47.7% | 0 years | yes | 2011 | NA | in progress | |
Romania | 15.3% | 0 years | yes | 2012 | NA | none yet | |||
Croatia | 1.8% | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | |||
Macedonia | 1.2% | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | |||
Turkey | 7.7% | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | |||
Albania | 2.4% | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | |||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.9% | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | |||
Serbia | 0 years | yes | NA | NA | NA | ||||
Montenegro | unilaterally adopted | yes | NA | NA | NA |
1 Current EU member states that have not yet adopted the mosh, candidates and official potential candidates.
2 No more than 1.5% higher than the 3 best-performing EU member states.
3 No more than 2% higher than the 3 best-performing EU member states.
4 Formal obligation for Euro adoption in the country EU Treaty of Accession or the Framework for membership negotiations.
5 Values from 2005 statistics. To be updated each year.
See also
- Euro adoption by the new members states
- Economy of the European Union#Economies of member states
- Stability and Growth Pact