Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saba'ad: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:31, 19 February 2018

Saba'ad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The parade of questionable Somali placenames continues, in this case with an article name which Geonames doesn't recognize at all and a name within the article which Geonames claims are some hills. The latter might be true, but there's no town at the coordinates given. Mangoe (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No sources at all pop up when searching for it. Jdcomix (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)±[reply]
Keep. The rationale for deletion seems at least to be a strawman fallacy and when taken as a whole with other comments, possibly an adhominem fallacy. Furthermore, in these areas Somalis are known for being nomadic, hence no fixed population figures are going to exist. Also, periods of drought occur which could also cause population displacement. Furthermore, dispersion is also very likely because of militia groups which do operate in these areas. Another reason why it is difficult to find sources for this locality is because of the lack of a standardised Somali. This is not the fault of the local community. It is the fault of the weakness of the Somali government. Most of these places are transliterated in a myriad of ways, hence will not be useful when doing a google search. 92.9.152.17 (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Geography|list of Geography-related deletion discussions]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 03:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' per nom. No sources at all pop up when searching for it. [[User:Jdcomix|Jdcomix]] ([[User talk:Jdcomix|talk]]) 13:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)±
+*'''Keep'''. The rationale for deletion seems at least to be a strawman fallacy and when taken as a whole with other comments, possibly an adhominem fallacy. Furthermore, in these areas Somalis are known for being nomadic, hence no fixed population figures are going to exist. Also, periods of drought occur which could also cause population displacement. Furthermore, dispersion is also very likely because of militia groups which do operate in these areas. Another reason why it is difficult to find sources for this locality is because of the lack of a standardised Somali. This is not the fault of the local community. It is the fault of the weakness of the Somali government. Most of these places are transliterated in a myriad of ways, hence will not be useful when doing a google search. [[Special:Contributions/92.9.152.17|92.9.152.17]] ([[User talk:92.9.152.17|talk]]) 21:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)