Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larson O'Brien

Larson O'Brien

Larson O'Brien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Founded in 2016 - fails WP:SUSTAINED. Only 21 attorneys -small company. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material or PR (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - Given that the article's creator was blocked for undisclosed paid editing and Edwardx's rationale above, I would not be opposed to a speedy deletion if such a thing could be made available for such a scenario. After all, these editing practices have no place in the encyclopedia.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't meet CORPDEPTH; the provided sources aren't substantive enough and there are UPE issues. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - article does not meet. WP:Corp