Talk:Imposters (TV series): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:12, 23 April 2018

Television: Episode coverage Start‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Production codes

When series such as Imposters air episodes in exactly the same order as they were produced (i.e. episodes air in the same order as as the production codes), there is no need to list the production codes in the episodes table (i.e. it's "redundant" info). I'm in no hurry to remove the prod. codes column from the episodes table right now, but myself or any other editor would be justified in removing the prod. codes column on this basis. FWIW. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title is clearly censored

The title varies on official and unofficial sources, so it is clearly censored and not for creative reasons. helmboy 05:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.bravotv.com/imposters/episode-guide

Old Unresolved Sh--

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/imposters/listings/ and zap2it and imdb

Old Unresolved S...

https://www.nbcumv.com/programming/bravo/imposters/episodes-schedule?network=33132

Old Unresolved Sh*t

We use Futon and Zap2It as our column sources – there it's "Old Unresolved S...". That's how it should be listed here. We follow the sourcing. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If people are interested in the "full" title (and, FTR, I find this kind of thing to be a pointless exercise...), then the RTitle parameter will have to be used for that episode, and a source that actually spells it all the way out will have to be used as the inline source. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo and NBC are official sources. Futon and Zap2It just edit press releases. And given two official sources are inconstant on the title, it's obviously been censored. helmboy 09:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter what you think. If you can't provide a source with the full spelling, the full spelling is WP:OR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@IJBall: Can't you read the three sources above have three alternate titles of the censored title and of the three you are reverting to the unofficial censored version. helmboy 13:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :: Bravo and NBC are official sources.  Futon and Zap2It just edit press releases. And given two official sources are inconstant on the title, it's obviously been censored. [[User_talk:Helmboy|helmboy]] 09:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 ::: It doesn't matter what ''you'' think. If you can't provide a source with the full spelling, the full spelling is [[WP:OR]]. --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 12:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
+::: {{ping|IJBall}} Can't you read the three sources above have three alternate titles of the censored title and of the three you are reverting to the unofficial censored version. [[User_talk:Helmboy|helmboy]] 13:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)