User talk:Blue Riband: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Titanic II: new section |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== [[Titanic II]] == |
== [[Titanic II]] == |
||
Hi Riband, thanks for pointing out the relevant discussion for [[TITANIIC]] and how it may impact [[Titanic II]]. I think as things stand I would not strongly object to a merge request to the Titanic II |
Hi Riband, thanks for pointing out the relevant discussion for [[TITANIIC]] and how it may impact [[Titanic II]]. I think as things stand I would not strongly object to a merge request to the Titanic II article as the project is clearly abandoned. I think in retrospect there is some justification for merging this and [[Replica Titanic]] in to the main Titanic article, although I wouldn't consider it worth the effort myself. It comes down to a debate on what level of detail is really encyclopaedic on a subject like this. Personally I'm happy with the articles as they are; serving as a perhaps over-detailed record of now abandoned projects, which would be inappropriate for the the main Titanic article. [[User:MatthewHaywood|MatthewHaywood]] ([[User talk:MatthewHaywood|talk]]) 16:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:46, 16 July 2018
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Hi Riband, thanks for pointing out the relevant discussion for TITANIIC and how it may impact Titanic II. I think as things stand I would not strongly object to a merge request to the Titanic II article as the project is clearly abandoned. I think in retrospect there is some justification for merging this and Replica Titanic in to the main Titanic article, although I wouldn't consider it worth the effort myself. It comes down to a debate on what level of detail is really encyclopaedic on a subject like this. Personally I'm happy with the articles as they are; serving as a perhaps over-detailed record of now abandoned projects, which would be inappropriate for the the main Titanic article. MatthewHaywood (talk) 16:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)