Jump to content

User talk:Will Pittenger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Thanks
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:


For catching that mistake, I can't beleive I made such a rookie error (I need to stay off of admin talk pages at 3 in the morning!). Best regards, [[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 13:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
For catching that mistake, I can't beleive I made such a rookie error (I need to stay off of admin talk pages at 3 in the morning!). Best regards, [[User:Yankees76|Yankees76]] 13:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

== You've made yourselves clear already ==

Thanks for the heads up, Will. If you'd care to read to discussions above your entry on my talk page, you'd see that the point has been made very clearly already. [[User:62.194.12.240|62.194.12.240]] 21:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:40, 1 November 2006

Image tagging for Image:Jennifer Knapp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jennifer Knapp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Portland Map

That's an excellent map, unfortunately I'm not well enough versed with technology to convert such a thing. Also there may be copyright issues, so someone may have to take it upon themselves to create a replica on their own. Bcirker 02:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "do not vandalize"

I have to say I'm puzzled by your comment. This user is a repeat vandal who has been warned multiple times for vandalizing various pages and created improper articles. What did you expect me to do? Pascal.Tesson 05:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But I did leave a note on his talk page. When reverting vandalism I prefer to use one of the standard test messages rather than go with my own inspiration. I really fail to see how this user could have thought this was a good faith edit when the page New Horizons has never been the target of vandalism (and given he never made other edits to it). Pascal.Tesson 05:11, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken

Re: MartinBot/TB2 conflict

Please reply at User talk:MartinBot#MartinBot had a resource conflict with User:Tawkerbot2

Hi, thanks for letting me know - could you point me to a diff? Thanks Martinp23 08:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite interesting - Firsst TB2, then MartinBot, then AVB - I'll report it to Tawker, the creator of the bots. For the signature, you're the second person to ask me in 24hours - so it's changed! There's a talk link in the second half of the sig, and it's actually shorter (because I realised blue font tags weren't really needed :)). About leaving mesages using the bot account - I'm afraid the the bot policy tells me that my bot can only make bot edits :S. Thanks, Martinp23 07:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too willing to put a "Bot" link in my sig, because I run over four of them - as for replying on MartinBot's page - I would do, but I'm really just following my normal system of replying on the posting user's page. Would it help for me to put a link at the top of my talk page to direct people to MartinBot's page, or perhaps to refactor comments to the bot's talk? Thanks for your input -- Martinp23 21:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You failed. The page was immediately copied from commons:Image:Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg. If the change needs to be made, that is where you should make it.

Frankly, though, the tag is there to request a PNG version -- not SVG. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the page didn't copy. There were two such templates there, and now there is one. –Outriggr § 06:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For catching that mistake, I can't beleive I made such a rookie error (I need to stay off of admin talk pages at 3 in the morning!). Best regards, Yankees76 13:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've made yourselves clear already

Thanks for the heads up, Will. If you'd care to read to discussions above your entry on my talk page, you'd see that the point has been made very clearly already. 62.194.12.240 21:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]