Talk:FatWallet: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I am not convinced that the term [[App-O-Rama]] is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
I am not convinced that the term [[App-O-Rama]] is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Could you please use <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
:Could you please use <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
:: Right now there are no references on the page, aside from the organization's own website. There need to be further references which prove notability, such as newspaper or magazine articles. A link to a legal document is what's called a "primary" source. We need secondary sources. See [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[WP:RS]]. --[[User:Elonka|Elonka]] 18:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:28, 2 November 2006
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FatWallet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Merge
I am not convinced that the term App-O-Rama is independently notable, and I recommend that its information be merged into this article. I would also like to see additional references for "FatWallet", to verify notability, as right now this article smells a lot like self-promotion. --Elonka 18:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Could you please use {{fact}} for specific statements in the article? The last two paragraphs about the lawsuit are in fact referenced. Postdlf 18:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Right now there are no references on the page, aside from the organization's own website. There need to be further references which prove notability, such as newspaper or magazine articles. A link to a legal document is what's called a "primary" source. We need secondary sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and WP:RS. --Elonka 18:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)