User talk:Cowman2333: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:36, 6 August 2018

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Beatles, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GoingBatty (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 13:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question re: QAnon

Hello,

I say this meaning no disrespect, but do you happen to be a QAnon sympathizer/follower? Adelsheim (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adelsheim. Why would this question be disrespectful? Your bias comes through by saying this! I have no personal beliefs regarding Qanon. Regarding EDITS, please keep in mind Wikipedia's policies regarding neutral content! Wikipedia is not the place for unsubstantiated information that has yet to be verified. Cowman2333 (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Hello Adelsheim. Why would this question be disrespectful? Your bias comes through by saying this! I have no personal beliefs regarding Qanon. Regarding EDITS, please keep in mind Wikipedia's policies regarding neutral content! Wikipedia is not the place for unsubstantiated information that has yet to be verified. [[User:Cowman2333|Cowman2333]] ([[User talk:Cowman2333#top|talk]]) 01:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
-== August 2018 ==
-<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 02:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->