Talk:Letter to Benedetto Castelli: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:39, 29 September 2018

innovative

I'm dubious about innovative. Was G really the first? These arguments are all tolerably obvious William M. Connolley (talk) 11:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The general arguments about the authority of scripture in science were bold. The specific argument about the interpretation of the Book of Joshua was completely original.Mccapra (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible mistake

Nicolo Arrighetti is mentioned as being active in 1613. The Wikipedia article linked to on Nicolo Arrighetti says that he was born in 1709.

Another, called Nicola Arrighetti might be the one referred to. Nicola died in 1639 and might have been active in 1613. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.195.66.18 (talk) 06:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nicola Arrighetti might also have been called Niccolo Arrighetti.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Nicolo Arrighetti is mentioned as being active in 1613. The Wikipedia article linked to on Nicolo Arrighetti says that he was born in 1709.
 :Another, called Nicola Arrighetti might be the one referred to. Nicola died in 1639 and might have been active in 1613.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.195.66.18|207.195.66.18]] ([[User talk:207.195.66.18#top|talk]]) 06:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+::Nicola Arrighetti might also have been called Niccolo Arrighetti.