Jump to content

Talk:BMW 5 Series (E34): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Nice entry. Does anyone who has an interest in this article know whether it meets the standards for Featured Article status? I'm still a relative newbie so I don't know how that's judged, nor how to go about nominating it. [[User:Longshot14|Longshot14]] 18:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Nice entry. Does anyone who has an interest in this article know whether it meets the standards for Featured Article status? I'm still a relative newbie so I don't know how that's judged, nor how to go about nominating it. [[User:Longshot14|Longshot14]] 18:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


The 530i DID NOT have a V8 engine...it had a inline-4.
The 530i DID NOT have a V8 engine...it had a inline-6.


==External Links==
==External Links==

Revision as of 03:00, 9 November 2006

The 530i section sounds like it's BMW's own advertizement. It may or may not be copyrighted (BMW probably doesn't mind it being here), but it certainly doesn't seem encyclopedic. Luqui 09:17, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)

Ready For Prime-Time?

Nice entry. Does anyone who has an interest in this article know whether it meets the standards for Featured Article status? I'm still a relative newbie so I don't know how that's judged, nor how to go about nominating it. Longshot14 18:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 530i DID NOT have a V8 engine...it had a inline-6.

I'm well aware of the "no linkspam" policy. However, I, as an E34 owner, find the three sites below (with which I am not affiliated in any way) to be an invaluable resource for all things E34. Therefore I think that they should be in the article. Please let me know your opinions. DonIncognito 19:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forums are generally not considered reliable sources. I have no opinion on bmwe34.net though. --AbsolutDan (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps not for the content of the article, but I do find these two particular ones an invaluable resource for the owner. DonIncognito 22:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I respect your opinion. Could some other editors of this article chime in with their thoughts on the links? --AbsolutDan (talk) 00:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]