Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman al-Said: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
more
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Comment''' I am not sure if this person is notable. I was able to find this source which seems credible (but one is not enough) [http://www.alsahawat.com/corporate-governance-sahibzada-dr-shamsaldin-qais-sulayman-al-said-the-international-press-and-media-group/ Alsahawat Times]. -- [[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] ([[User talk:Willthacheerleader18|talk]]) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I am not sure if this person is notable. I was able to find this source which seems credible (but one is not enough) [http://www.alsahawat.com/corporate-governance-sahibzada-dr-shamsaldin-qais-sulayman-al-said-the-international-press-and-media-group/ Alsahawat Times]. -- [[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] ([[User talk:Willthacheerleader18|talk]]) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
:*[[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] Thanks for your kind comment. the link you gave above says Alsahawat Times is owned by the subject Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman. So that site is not only dodgy but [[WP:SPS]] as well. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 20:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
:*[[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] Thanks for your kind comment. the link you gave above says Alsahawat Times is owned by the subject Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman. So that site is not only dodgy but [[WP:SPS]] as well. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 20:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''There seems to be enough independent sources for this to be a genuine article, all be it not very well put together. I would suggest a clean up and re-write to improve impartiality instead as looking through the history of edits it appears to be fine up until a point when now blocked users started to add a mixture of clear promotional information and possible vandalism. Should no one be able to do so then I will volunteer to do some research into this and clean this article up so that it is more factual and non-bias. Agreed that references from publications owned by the subject regardless of how legitimate or official they may be will raise some concerns over impartiality. Yet I do see enough third party references to warrant proper research and clean up rather than deletion. [[User:Museumfan1983|Museumfan1983]] ([[User talk:Museumfan1983|talk]]) 15:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:38, 13 November 2018

Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman al-Said (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Vanity/promotional biography which claims to be of an Omani royal, but the sources are blogs, promo sites and forums. Has WP:REFBOMBS of fake sources and WP:SPS. No source to prove why this person is notable. Can't find either. An IP had raised concerns on the talk page about the authenticity of this article. DBigXray 00:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 01:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DBigXray 03:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentThere seems to be enough independent sources for this to be a genuine article, all be it not very well put together. I would suggest a clean up and re-write to improve impartiality instead as looking through the history of edits it appears to be fine up until a point when now blocked users started to add a mixture of clear promotional information and possible vandalism. Should no one be able to do so then I will volunteer to do some research into this and clean this article up so that it is more factual and non-bias. Agreed that references from publications owned by the subject regardless of how legitimate or official they may be will raise some concerns over impartiality. Yet I do see enough third party references to warrant proper research and clean up rather than deletion. Museumfan1983 (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]