Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman al-Said: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
more |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Comment''' I am not sure if this person is notable. I was able to find this source which seems credible (but one is not enough) [http://www.alsahawat.com/corporate-governance-sahibzada-dr-shamsaldin-qais-sulayman-al-said-the-international-press-and-media-group/ Alsahawat Times]. -- [[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] ([[User talk:Willthacheerleader18|talk]]) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' I am not sure if this person is notable. I was able to find this source which seems credible (but one is not enough) [http://www.alsahawat.com/corporate-governance-sahibzada-dr-shamsaldin-qais-sulayman-al-said-the-international-press-and-media-group/ Alsahawat Times]. -- [[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] ([[User talk:Willthacheerleader18|talk]]) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
:*[[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] Thanks for your kind comment. the link you gave above says Alsahawat Times is owned by the subject Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman. So that site is not only dodgy but [[WP:SPS]] as well. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 20:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
:*[[User:Willthacheerleader18|Willthacheerleader18]] Thanks for your kind comment. the link you gave above says Alsahawat Times is owned by the subject Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman. So that site is not only dodgy but [[WP:SPS]] as well. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 20:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''There seems to be enough independent sources for this to be a genuine article, all be it not very well put together. I would suggest a clean up and re-write to improve impartiality instead as looking through the history of edits it appears to be fine up until a point when now blocked users started to add a mixture of clear promotional information and possible vandalism. Should no one be able to do so then I will volunteer to do some research into this and clean this article up so that it is more factual and non-bias. Agreed that references from publications owned by the subject regardless of how legitimate or official they may be will raise some concerns over impartiality. Yet I do see enough third party references to warrant proper research and clean up rather than deletion. [[User:Museumfan1983|Museumfan1983]] ([[User talk:Museumfan1983|talk]]) 15:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:38, 13 November 2018
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman al-Said (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Vanity/promotional biography which claims to be of an Omani royal, but the sources are blogs, promo sites and forums. Has WP:REFBOMBS of fake sources and WP:SPS. No source to prove why this person is notable. Can't find either. An IP had raised concerns on the talk page about the authenticity of this article. DBigXrayᗙ 00:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
KEEP This is clearly not a genuine request for deletion as these so called blogs are ISSN registered international newspapers and official government documentation. This user cites restricted comments and edits by a banned IP user as their sole reason. The most ridiculous case of trolling I've seen.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameera Patel (talk • contribs) 01:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC) — Ameera Patel (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of LewisChu (talk • contribs). – Struck above comment from blocked sock per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Sam Sailor 08:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 01:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Instead of being called a troll[1], I would prefer to see some sources that prove this person is notable. Please provide the links that satisfy WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources--DBigXrayᗙ 01:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DBigXrayᗙ 03:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I am not sure if this person is notable. I was able to find this source which seems credible (but one is not enough) Alsahawat Times. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Willthacheerleader18 Thanks for your kind comment. the link you gave above says Alsahawat Times is owned by the subject Shamsaldin Qais Sulayman. So that site is not only dodgy but WP:SPS as well. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- CommentThere seems to be enough independent sources for this to be a genuine article, all be it not very well put together. I would suggest a clean up and re-write to improve impartiality instead as looking through the history of edits it appears to be fine up until a point when now blocked users started to add a mixture of clear promotional information and possible vandalism. Should no one be able to do so then I will volunteer to do some research into this and clean this article up so that it is more factual and non-bias. Agreed that references from publications owned by the subject regardless of how legitimate or official they may be will raise some concerns over impartiality. Yet I do see enough third party references to warrant proper research and clean up rather than deletion. Museumfan1983 (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)