Talk:Romans 13: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Use of Romans 13 in political debates: new section |
→The actual meaning of Romans 13 in politics: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The article could be improved by adding information about uses of this chapter in debates over what was proper for a government to do: https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/06/15/the-historical-precedent-of-trotting-out-the-bible-to-justify-oppression/ [the link is to an opinion piece; I link to it because it provides an overview of this issue, as well as links to better/usable sources]. -- <span style="font-family:Brush Script MT; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </span> [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 16:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
The article could be improved by adding information about uses of this chapter in debates over what was proper for a government to do: https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/06/15/the-historical-precedent-of-trotting-out-the-bible-to-justify-oppression/ [the link is to an opinion piece; I link to it because it provides an overview of this issue, as well as links to better/usable sources]. -- <span style="font-family:Brush Script MT; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </span> [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 16:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
||
== The actual meaning of Romans 13 in politics == |
|||
It's very odd, as far as I'm concerned, that the actual meaning of Paul's statements on civil authority is never explained in the page. Rather, we just get modern commentary rather than what scholarship says regarding its meaning.[[Special:Contributions/70.49.181.61|70.49.181.61]] ([[User talk:70.49.181.61|talk]]) 19:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:13, 24 November 2018
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Bible Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Use of Romans 13 in political debates
The article could be improved by adding information about uses of this chapter in debates over what was proper for a government to do: https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/06/15/the-historical-precedent-of-trotting-out-the-bible-to-justify-oppression/ [the link is to an opinion piece; I link to it because it provides an overview of this issue, as well as links to better/usable sources]. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The actual meaning of Romans 13 in politics
It's very odd, as far as I'm concerned, that the actual meaning of Paul's statements on civil authority is never explained in the page. Rather, we just get modern commentary rather than what scholarship says regarding its meaning.70.49.181.61 (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)