Talk:London Buses route 328: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:What it means is that your ongoing campaign to eradicate London bus route articles by flagging them as not notable and then deleting them a couple of months later won't work in this case, the previous consensus not to delete will override. [[User:Morteinmeil|Morteinmeil]] ([[User talk:Morteinmeil|talk]]) 03:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
:What it means is that your ongoing campaign to eradicate London bus route articles by flagging them as not notable and then deleting them a couple of months later won't work in this case, the previous consensus not to delete will override. [[User:Morteinmeil|Morteinmeil]] ([[User talk:Morteinmeil|talk]]) 03:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
::The articles aren't being eradicated as the history is still intact. They are being redirected due to lack of established [[WP:GNG|notability]], which in this case has not been affirmed in the previous AfD as it closed without consensus. [[User:Ajf773|Ajf773]] ([[User talk:Ajf773|talk]]) 06:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
::The articles aren't being eradicated as the history is still intact. They are being redirected due to lack of established [[WP:GNG|notability]], which in this case has not been affirmed in the previous AfD as it closed without consensus. [[User:Ajf773|Ajf773]] ([[User talk:Ajf773|talk]]) 06:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
::{{ping|Jeni|Morteinmeil}} Further to what Morteinmeil said above, the AfD found that there was no consensus regarding this article's notability. Hence there is no consensus to add a notability tag to the top, which has been further demonstrated by two editors (myself and Morteinmeil) protesting its addition. If a notability tag is contested, it should go to Articles for deletion, not edit warred back in (per the instructions at [[Template:Notability]]). Please don't edit war to add it back in when there is no consensus to do so. [[User:Jcc|jcc]] ([[User talk:Jcc#top|tea and biscuits]]) 10:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Jeni|Morteinmeil}} Further to what Morteinmeil said above, the AfD found that there was no consensus regarding this article's notability. Hence there is no consensus to add a notability tag to the top, which has been further demonstrated by two editors (myself and Morteinmeil) protesting its addition. If a notability tag is contested, it should go to Articles for deletion, not edit warred back in (per the instructions at [[Template:Notability]]). Please don't edit war to add it back in when there is no consensus to do so, demonstrated both here and at the AFD discussion. [[User:Jcc|jcc]] ([[User talk:Jcc#top|tea and biscuits]]) 10:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:10, 2 December 2018
This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
London Transport Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on London Buses route 328. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130622122516/http://www.transitsystems.com.au/articles-t-t/313-tower-transit-announces-first-group-partial-acquisition-9-april-2013 to http://www.transitsystems.com.au/articles-t-t/313-tower-transit-announces-first-group-partial-acquisition-9-april-2013
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Notability
I added the notability flag only to have it removed by Jcc. The previous AfD closed as no consensus meaning notability is not established. Nothing significant has been added since the AfD therefore the flag was valid. Ajf773 (talk) 00:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- What it means is that your ongoing campaign to eradicate London bus route articles by flagging them as not notable and then deleting them a couple of months later won't work in this case, the previous consensus not to delete will override. Morteinmeil (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- The articles aren't being eradicated as the history is still intact. They are being redirected due to lack of established notability, which in this case has not been affirmed in the previous AfD as it closed without consensus. Ajf773 (talk) 06:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeni and Morteinmeil: Further to what Morteinmeil said above, the AfD found that there was no consensus regarding this article's notability. Hence there is no consensus to add a notability tag to the top, which has been further demonstrated by two editors (myself and Morteinmeil) protesting its addition. If a notability tag is contested, it should go to Articles for deletion, not edit warred back in (per the instructions at Template:Notability). Please don't edit war to add it back in when there is no consensus to do so, demonstrated both here and at the AFD discussion. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)