Talk:Catherine Coulter: Difference between revisions
m added infobox |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|listas= |
|listas= |
||
}} |
}} |
||
==In template linking== |
|||
I've changed the Official website link in the template from [http://www.catherinecoulter.com/] to [http://www.catherinecoulter.com/ CatherineCoulter.com]. The link was original changed to [http://www.catherinecoulter.com/] citing [[WP:MOS]] but when checking both the manual of style and [[Wikipedia: Manual of Style (links)]] I could find nothing about in template usage. ''You should not add a descriptive title to an embedded HTML link within an article. Instead, when giving an embedded link as a source within an article'' Given the fact that the link is not an html link within the article, nor is it used as a source I believe [http://www.catherinecoulter.com/ CatherineCoulter.com] is the more appropriate formating of this link especially since it is providing a descriptive title to what is basically a parameter that is asking for an external link. Please discuss before changing. Thanks! --[[User:ImmortalGoddezz|ImmortalGoddezz]] 05:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:10, 13 November 2006
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
In template linking
I've changed the Official website link in the template from [1] to CatherineCoulter.com. The link was original changed to [2] citing WP:MOS but when checking both the manual of style and Wikipedia: Manual of Style (links) I could find nothing about in template usage. You should not add a descriptive title to an embedded HTML link within an article. Instead, when giving an embedded link as a source within an article Given the fact that the link is not an html link within the article, nor is it used as a source I believe CatherineCoulter.com is the more appropriate formating of this link especially since it is providing a descriptive title to what is basically a parameter that is asking for an external link. Please discuss before changing. Thanks! --ImmortalGoddezz 05:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)