Jump to content

User talk:Kdbuffalo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blanking page
Kasreyn (talk | contribs)
rv. Please do not remove valid warnings, it's disruptive.
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:kdbuffalo/scrapcopy]]

== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
==Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Stoner&action=history] made on [[October 17]] [[2006]] to [[Peter_Stoner]]==
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px| ]]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div>
<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:Kdbuffalo&action=edit&section=new block] is 24 hours. [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 15:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)</div>

m

== Mediation Case Notification ==

You have been listed as an involved party in a mediation case [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-16 Deletions by user Kdbuffalo|here]] involving [[Bible prophesy]] and [[Peter Stoner]], and I have accepted the case. Please check out the page and let us hear your side. Thanks! [[User:Nwwaew|Nwwaew]]([[User_Talk:Nwwaew|<small>My talk page</small>]]) 20:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

==re:A vote for the deletion of the article based on notability was already done.==

Please, please do not remove the AfD header. Articles can be nominated more than once. Please make your case at the AfD page, and be sure to mention it was kept before. However, DO NOT, under any circumstance, remove AfD headers. The discussion has already been started. If it was kept before, then you shouldn't have anything to worry about, right? Just let the AfD play though and make sure to state your case. Deleting the AfD is not AGF on behalf of your fellow wikipedians, and it is clearly an out of process, rogue move. Thanks.--[[User:Andrew c|Andrew c]] 16:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

:I agree completely with your move of Turkel to Holding. The article was moved to Turkel, out of process mind you, only a week ago. However, when you move articles you need to check for "double redirects" you can do this by clicking on "what links here" and if there are any redirect pages that are nested under other redirect pages, you need to go to that page and change what article the redirect points to (for example, if there is a Robert Turkel page that is redirected to JP Holding, you need to edit the redirect page so it points to James Patrick Holding instead. make sense?)--[[User:Andrew c|Andrew c]] 16:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

::[[Wikipedia:Double redirects]] may help you. There is more to moving pages than just hitting the move tab. Also, if an article cannot simply be moved to where you want it to be, you need to request administrator assistance. Settling for another name because you cannot do the move yourself is unacceptable (because admins can do these moves for us). If the move is controversial, you need to submit a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves]]. If it isn't, you can post on the talk page there, asking an admin to move the page for you, if you explain in detail why it needs to be moved. I propose moving the article back to the consensus which was reached during the last AfD, that is to [[J. P. Holding]] (the name which he signs his online articles). --[[User:Andrew c|Andrew c]] 17:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

:::I see you still haven't fixed the double redirect problem. The link you added to the [[Richard Carrier]] page ([[JP Holding]]) is an example of a double redirect. Click it and see where it takes you.--[[User:Andrew c|Andrew c]] 21:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

== Dawkins ==

Hi Ken. Much the same happened when I tried to introduce a criticism section. Let's try to work together and sandbox something. [[User:NBeale|NBeale]] 17:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

== 3RR ==

Just want to remind you of [[WP:3RR]]. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 06:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

: You haven't but you've added the tag on three times so I thought it might be prudent to remind you. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 06:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:48, 17 November 2006

User:kdbuffalo/scrapcopy

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on October 17 2006 to Peter_Stoner

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 15:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

m

Mediation Case Notification

You have been listed as an involved party in a mediation case here involving Bible prophesy and Peter Stoner, and I have accepted the case. Please check out the page and let us hear your side. Thanks! Nwwaew(My talk page) 20:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:A vote for the deletion of the article based on notability was already done.

Please, please do not remove the AfD header. Articles can be nominated more than once. Please make your case at the AfD page, and be sure to mention it was kept before. However, DO NOT, under any circumstance, remove AfD headers. The discussion has already been started. If it was kept before, then you shouldn't have anything to worry about, right? Just let the AfD play though and make sure to state your case. Deleting the AfD is not AGF on behalf of your fellow wikipedians, and it is clearly an out of process, rogue move. Thanks.--Andrew c 16:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely with your move of Turkel to Holding. The article was moved to Turkel, out of process mind you, only a week ago. However, when you move articles you need to check for "double redirects" you can do this by clicking on "what links here" and if there are any redirect pages that are nested under other redirect pages, you need to go to that page and change what article the redirect points to (for example, if there is a Robert Turkel page that is redirected to JP Holding, you need to edit the redirect page so it points to James Patrick Holding instead. make sense?)--Andrew c 16:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Double redirects may help you. There is more to moving pages than just hitting the move tab. Also, if an article cannot simply be moved to where you want it to be, you need to request administrator assistance. Settling for another name because you cannot do the move yourself is unacceptable (because admins can do these moves for us). If the move is controversial, you need to submit a Wikipedia:Requested moves. If it isn't, you can post on the talk page there, asking an admin to move the page for you, if you explain in detail why it needs to be moved. I propose moving the article back to the consensus which was reached during the last AfD, that is to J. P. Holding (the name which he signs his online articles). --Andrew c 17:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see you still haven't fixed the double redirect problem. The link you added to the Richard Carrier page (JP Holding) is an example of a double redirect. Click it and see where it takes you.--Andrew c 21:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dawkins

Hi Ken. Much the same happened when I tried to introduce a criticism section. Let's try to work together and sandbox something. NBeale 17:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Just want to remind you of WP:3RR. JoshuaZ 06:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't but you've added the tag on three times so I thought it might be prudent to remind you. JoshuaZ 06:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]