Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aysha Naushad Khan (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 08:47, 15 March 2019

Aysha Naushad Khan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was perviously nominated here in 2014, with no consensus. Some T20I women's cricketers from minor cricketing countries don't qualify for inclusion under WP:CRIN, even after the ICC awarding all women's international sides T20I status. So why should this article be included? The matches Khan played were minor, carried no status, the coverage is routine, and the subject does not appear to have played cricket for nearly 3 years. StickyWicket (talk) 20:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP don't know much about cricket or this person, I just googled her and the first things popped up was her wikipedia article, maybe because it is hanging in there for a quiet a while, she doesn't have notability but according to cited sources she meeds WP:GNG but fails WP:RS. Being on wikipedia for quiet a long I suggest keep.SZ1999 (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article being the first result on google is absolutely no reason to keep it, nor is the fact its been around for a while. Spike 'em (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG : Only one of the referenced articles actually covers her in detail, the rest are passing mentions / routine coverage / stats listings. Fails WP:NCRIC too by my reckoning. Spike 'em (talk) 20:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think she fails WP:NCRIC but just passes WP:GNG. This article is entirely about her, and I think the three paragraphs about her in this article might also count as significant coverage. The second article definitely addresses her directly. I'm not sure how in detail it needs to be to be considered significant, but for me it's got enough details. These are the only two articles I could find online that had more than a trivial mention of her (and they're also the two articles that were brought up in the previous AfD), so if either of these doesn't count as significant coverage then I'll change my vote to delete unless another source comes up. TripleRoryFan (talk) 08:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ::This article being the first result on google is absolutely no reason to keep it, nor is the fact its been around for a while. [[User:Spike &#39;em|Spike &#39;em]] ([[User talk:Spike &#39;em|talk]]) 20:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]] : Only one of the referenced articles actually covers her in detail, the rest are passing mentions / routine coverage / stats listings. Fails [[WP:NCRIC]] too by my reckoning. [[User:Spike &#39;em|Spike &#39;em]] ([[User talk:Spike &#39;em|talk]]) 20:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' I think she fails [[WP:NCRIC]] but just passes [[WP:GNG]]. [https://gulfnews.com/sport/cricket/bowled-em-over-1.971431 This article] is entirely about her, and I think the three paragraphs about her in [https://www.thenational.ae/sport/women-s-cricket-could-catch-on-in-the-uae-1.472813 this article] might also count as significant coverage. The second article definitely addresses her directly. I'm not sure how in detail it needs to be to be considered significant, but for me it's got enough details. These are the only two articles I could find online that had more than a trivial mention of her (and they're also the two articles that were brought up in the previous AfD), so if either of these doesn't count as significant coverage then I'll change my vote to delete unless another source comes up. [[User:TripleRoryFan|TripleRoryFan]] ([[User talk:TripleRoryFan|talk]]) 08:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)