Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Caldecott: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Thomas E. Caldecott: comment |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep''' – Article is sourced properly and satisfies [[WP:POLITICIAN]]. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 10:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' – Article is sourced properly and satisfies [[WP:POLITICIAN]]. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 10:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong Delete''' It is in no way properly sourced. None of the 3 sources, one of which is an untitled and unlinked local newspaper article and another of which is primary, are used in line. Best, [[User:GPL93|GPL93]] ([[User_talk:GPL93|talk]]) 17:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Strong Delete''' It is in no way properly sourced. None of the 3 sources, one of which is an untitled and unlinked local newspaper article and another of which is primary, are used in line. Best, [[User:GPL93|GPL93]] ([[User_talk:GPL93|talk]]) 17:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
::'''Comment''' - I’m sorry, am I misinterpreting [[ WP:POLITICIAN]] where it states that; “…The following are presumed to be notable:•Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.[12] This also applies to persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them". Appreciate showing me where I am wrong. Every day is a learning experience. No snarky remarks meant here. <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 17:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:32, 22 March 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thomas E. Caldecott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced article that doesn't pass WP:GNG. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 08:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – Article is sourced properly and satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. ShoesssS Talk 10:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Delete It is in no way properly sourced. None of the 3 sources, one of which is an untitled and unlinked local newspaper article and another of which is primary, are used in line. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I’m sorry, am I misinterpreting WP:POLITICIAN where it states that; “…The following are presumed to be notable:•Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.[12] This also applies to persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them". Appreciate showing me where I am wrong. Every day is a learning experience. No snarky remarks meant here. ShoesssS Talk 17:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC)