Jump to content

User talk:Thescholarlyinsight: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Removed.
Removed.
Line 2: Line 2:
== September 2018 ==
== September 2018 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 01:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 01:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock -->
== Nomination of [[:Ethan Levy]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Ethan Levy]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Levy]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:THEFlint Shrubwood|THEFlint Shrubwood]] ([[User talk:THEFlint Shrubwood|talk]]) 01:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:STW Talent Agency]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:STW Talent Agency]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

Revision as of 12:38, 6 April 2019

September 2018

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 01:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article STW Talent Agency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable and not notable company. Having one notable actor doesn't inherently make a talent agency notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thescholarlyinsight (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

With all due respect DMACKS, I am genuinely trying to contribute to the Wikipedia database. I am only adding facts to the database, therefore, I am unsure what your issue is. Wikipedia is utilized to help find information on those within various industries, yes? I'd like for you to reconsider your decision for I am sincerely trying to do good.

Decline reason:

You are promoting various non-notable entities and people, including yourself. That's not doing good, at least not from Wikipedia's point of view. Huon (talk) 22:42, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which has articles about subjects covered in independent reliable sources that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability. Please explain your relationship to STW Talent Agency. 331dot (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Thescholarlyinsight (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #24616 was submitted on Apr 05, 2019 12:44:08.

Notes:

  • If you are the blocked user, an administrator will find your request on UTRS and should email you shortly. Please do not request additional unblocks. Tickets may take 24-48 hours to process. Tickets will expire after 1 week if you have not responded via the web interface to any emails from the reviewing administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages are not usually deleted as a whole. In addition, declined unblock requests cannot be removed while the block is in effect; you may remove other content if you wish, but those must remain. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]