Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooster Collective: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:58, 10 April 2019

Wooster Collective

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't appear to pass notability requirements. There are a lot of Google hits, but they're quite sparse and trivial, such as " “I don’t mind destruction, I don’t mind debate, but I do mind something that comes off as being intellectual but is actually simplistic and juvenile,” said Marc Schiller, whose Web site, Wooster Collective, documents street art. " and this one is on the more extensive side of brief mentions. Graywalls (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I can understand the nomination to AFD in that there is no true INDEPTH articles concerning just Wooster Collective in a typical Google News search. However there are quite a few mentions and references of the Wooster Collective in RS such as the New York Times – Huffington Post – Time (magazine) and several other secondary reliable sources, as shown here [1]. In addition, if we expand our search to include Google Scholar we see that the organization is well represented with more In-depth exposure as shown here [[2]]. Given this information I believe the organization has gained enough attention to have a piece here at Wikipedia. Thanks ShoesssS ^Talk 14:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:CASSIOPEIA|<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>]])</sup> 13:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Keep''' – I can understand the nomination to AFD in that there is no true INDEPTH articles concerning just Wooster Collective in a typical [[Google News]] search.  However there are quite a few mentions and references of the Wooster Collective in [[WP:RS|RS]] such as the [[New York Times]] – [[Huffington Post]] – [[Time (magazine)]] and several other secondary reliable sources, as shown here [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Wooster+Collective%22&safe=active&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-z9iP48XhAhVFmuAKHTO2DtgQ_AUIESgE&biw=1536&bih=768].  In addition, if we expand our search to include [[Google Scholar]] we see that the organization is well represented with more In-depth exposure as shown here [[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C47&q=%22Wooster+Collective%22&btnG=]].  Given this information I believe the organization has gained enough attention to have a piece here at Wikipedia.  Thanks <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></span> 14:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)