Talk:Deepfake: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:25, 1 May 2019

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It seems strange to instantly mention the pornographic aspects right in the, what, third sentence? In the "introduction" part of the article, anyway. It comes off as reductive of a technology that can have widespread uses.--83.192.75.196 (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It reflects the view of the majority of the sources. Wqwt (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this article be a bit more impartial?

The positive aspects of this emerging technology are being excluded, it is unjustly being treated negatively. Couldn't this be used as a tool to make animations, Japanese-style Cartoons, or possibly videogames that look very realistic? Making fake videos of real people should be regulated, but this technology should not be treated with this much prejudice. An Encyclopedia should present facts in a balanced way; positives AND negatives.108.224.106.197 (talk) 08:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 It seems strange to instantly mention the pornographic aspects right in the, what, third sentence? In the "introduction" part of the article, anyway. It comes off as reductive of a technology that can have widespread uses.--[[Special:Contributions/83.192.75.196|83.192.75.196]] ([[User talk:83.192.75.196|talk]]) 15:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 :It reflects the view of the majority of the sources. [[User:Wqwt|Wqwt]] ([[User talk:Wqwt|talk]]) 03:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
+== Shouldn't this article be a bit more impartial? ==
+The positive aspects of this emerging technology are being excluded, it is unjustly being treated negatively.  Couldn't this be used as a tool to make animations, Japanese-style Cartoons, or possibly videogames that look very realistic?  Making fake videos of real people should be regulated, but this technology should not be treated with this much prejudice.  An Encyclopedia should present facts in a balanced way; positives AND negatives.[[Special:Contributions/108.224.106.197|108.224.106.197]] ([[User talk:108.224.106.197|talk]]) 08:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)