Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novus (role-playing game): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ritchie333 (talk | contribs) delete |
CabbagePower (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''Delete''' Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''', article seems to be blatant advertisement. [[User:CabbagePower|CabbagePower]] ([[User talk:CabbagePower|talk]]) 16:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:51, 25 June 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Novus (role-playing game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is on a game whose only source is an entry at Goodreads, a non-RS user-generated review site.
A WP:BEFORE in the following fails to find any references: newspapers.com, Google Books, Google News, JSTOR.
A general Google search turns-up a handful of additional sources all of which are non-RS and, even if they weren't, merely prove the game exists versus it being notable: rpg.net (citizen journalism site), drivethrurpg.com (retail ecommerce site), plus several blogs, web forums, and the usual. Chetsford (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, article seems to be blatant advertisement. CabbagePower (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)