Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novus (role-playing game): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:51, 25 June 2019

Novus (role-playing game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is on a game whose only source is an entry at Goodreads, a non-RS user-generated review site.

A WP:BEFORE in the following fails to find any references: newspapers.com, Google Books, Google News, JSTOR.

A general Google search turns-up a handful of additional sources all of which are non-RS and, even if they weren't, merely prove the game exists versus it being notable: rpg.net (citizen journalism site), drivethrurpg.com (retail ecommerce site), plus several blogs, web forums, and the usual. Chetsford (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article seems to be blatant advertisement. CabbagePower (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:02, 25 June 2019 edit Ritchie333 (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators 124,939 edits delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:51, 25 June 2019 edit undo CabbagePower (talk \| contribs) 31 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	* '''Delete''' Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. [[User:Ritchie333\|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333\|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333\|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)		* '''Delete''' Chetsford has pretty much said everything I want to. As well as being unsourced, and no obvious sources turning up, the article looks completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia topic. [[User:Ritchie333\|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333\|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333\|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

			* '''Delete''', article seems to be blatant advertisement. [[User:CabbagePower\|CabbagePower]] ([[User talk:CabbagePower\|talk]]) 16:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)