User talk:Irishpunktom: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
unblock GRANTED |
Irishpunktom (talk | contribs) nor this |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-userreq}} |
|||
<div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; z-index: 2">[[Image:Dancingpenguin.gif|{{{1|80}}}px]]</div> |
|||
<div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; right: 500px; z-index: 2">[[Image: Lighteningstrikeanimation.gif|{{{1|80}}}px]]</div> |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[Image:Badly_Drawn_Boy_Live_at_l'Elysée_Montmartre.jpg|thumb|centre]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|<center> <font size="+2">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irishpunktom&action=edit§ion=new Something to talk about?]'''[[Image:Evolution-tasks.png]]</br></font> |
|||
<font size="-1">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irishpunktom&action=edit§ion=new Click here to leave a new message!]</small></center></font> |
|||
|} |
|||
[[User talk:Irishpunktom/Old Stuff|Old Stuff]] |
|||
== Revert parole == |
|||
Your revert parole limits you to one revert per article per week. I think you are over your limit on [[Muhammad]]. I see you were blocked for this on 17 October for 48 hours. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 21:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:You may want to revert yourself as an act of good faith. Thanks. --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 01:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: I will revert it again to your change. --- [[User:ALM scientist|ابراهيم]] 10:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::Thanks, both of you, and I'm sorry that you had to deal with a block anyway. Please let me know if I was wrong in making my suggestion. Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Interesting Article == |
|||
Irishpunktom , have a look at this [http://www.aurora.edu/cfa/published/muhammad.htm]. It is written by another scholar of Islam who respects(and even loves) Muhammad so much (like Watt) but explains why these Islamic scholars don't convert to Islam. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 10:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:you're welcome brother. --[[User:Aminz|Aminz]] 11:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Email == |
|||
Salam, please read your email. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 15:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == |
|||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> |
|||
==Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&action=history] made on [[November 9]] [[2006]] to [[Muhammad]]== |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|left|30px| ]] |
|||
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div> |
|||
<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:Irishpunktom&action=edit§ion=new block] is 24 hours. |
|||
Please remember you're on parole. |
|||
[[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 19:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)</div> |
|||
<nowiki>{{unblock|I SRVed, which, as I understood it, does not count?}}</nowiki> |
|||
: Ahhhh... *thats* what that meant. OK, next time I suggest spelling it out in full... unblocked [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 20:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Theft == |
|||
Give them back immediately! ;-D (I'll take it as a compliment). [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 21:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Forgive me for saying this, but that is one ugly penguin! ;-). --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 22:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==New article you may want to edit== |
|||
Hello Irishpunktom, I've started a new article about Saudi Arabia's first feature film: [[Keif al-hal?]]. I invite you to contribute to it if such an article might interest you. Thanks. :-) ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span class='pBody' style='border: 0; color: gray; padding: 0; font-size: 100%;'>Netscott</span>]])'' 02:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Reverting Again on [[Muhammad]]== |
|||
After the nice admininstrator unblock from your revert parole now youre reverting AGAIN! Both me and Aminz! No discussion ever![[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 11:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Why not actual READ what you quote from Aisha? About salamander NOT GECKO![[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 11:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Irishpunktom youre reverting again== |
|||
Youre blocked again and again for reverting on [[Muhammad]] because of the revert parole: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irishpunktom&diff=81861193&oldid=80770535], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irishpunktom&diff=86775210&oldid=86730557]. Already blocked for three this week when only supposed to one a week. |
|||
'''Now youre doing the revert again''' of me and [[User:Aminz]] never any discussing as usual.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86922926&oldid=86922400].[[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 12:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Opiner, it is not very [[WP:CIV|civil]] to be posting messages to Irishpunktom's talk page and not actually direct your message ''to him''. Did you want reword this? ''([[User_talk:Netscott|→]][[User:Netscott|<span class='pBody' style='border: 0; color: gray; padding: 0; font-size: 100%;'>Netscott</span>]])'' 12:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::Youre right Netscott. I hope these changes are okay.[[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 12:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
You have still to show me the revert. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 12:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Dont play dumb with me! Here your revert[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86922926&oldid=86922400 11:44, 10 November 2006] to this previous version[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=prev&oldid=86675745 08:20, 9 November 2006] before this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86676976&oldid=86675745 08:33, 9 November 2006] and this one [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86867528&oldid=86864452 03:36, 10 November 2006]. Other changes since then about the trees also youre reverting.[[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 12:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: What on earth are you talking about? My edit removed some incorrect information and bears absolutely no relation to the other two edits you have provided, neither of which I was aware of (not that it matters - as they are irrelevent) --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 12:52, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::PLEASE! Two editors added material about trees, and the first thing in the morning you revert! How could you not know its a revert???[[User:Opiner|Opiner]] 13:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Again, please stop shouting. Now, I don't care who added what, or what they added, I did not revert to any previous version (as, presumeably tacitly admitted by you by virtue of the links provided). What I did was an edit. An edit which removed information which was false, and also information I considered irrelvent to the section it was under. Its not about reversions, its about creating a good encyclopedia article, a task that you be infinitely more successful if you refrained from [[WP:STALK|stalking me]], and tried helping properly.--[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 13:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I have not looked at the diffs yet, but I want to point out that reverting is undoing someone's work, not simply restoring a previous version. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 13:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86923402&oldid=86922400 11:48, 10 November 2006], removing the paragraph beginning "As to other forms of life, according to Minou Reeves,..." [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 14:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
'''Suggestion''', May I suggest that to avoid unnecessary conflict over your edits, you follow a procedure such as this. You make an edit, but instead of saving it, you copy it and paste it into the talk page, or perhaps into a sandbox page, and then ALM scientist or myself or some other editor could then actually make the edit to the Muhammad page. Conflict over which edits you are allowed to make is in my opinion not very useful. Sincerely, --[[User:BostonMA|BostonMA]] <font color = "blue"><sup>[[User talk:BostonMA|talk]]</sup></font> 14:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
It is best to avoid revert waring -- sometimes it can seem as if people tag team to avoid individuals exceeding their daily limit and it can be frustrating when there is quick reporting if you take the bait. The trick isn't to revert war but to take the discussion to the talk page. Patience and calm logic is the best response. --[[User:Deodar|Deodar]] 07:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Your input required == |
|||
My dear brother, I am missing your input at [[Talk:Muhammad/Mediation]]. Please help in solving this dispute for long time to come. --- [[User:ALM scientist|ابراهيم]] 09:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Islam]] == |
|||
Please see the talk page for details on the Salafi edits. [[user:BhaiSaab|BhaiSaab]] <sup>[[user talk:BhaiSaab|talk]]</sup> 17:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Islam in the United States]] == |
|||
Please go take a look now. I made a new section for discussions of public opinion re Muslims, instances of persecution of Muslims, criticism of Muslims, and replies to criticism. The section needs more references and probably further thought. For instance, if we're going to describe how Muslims (and Sikhs) have been treated badly, we probably ought to discuss trials of native-born or immigrant Muslims for terrorism (there's a good article in a recent Atlantic on this; [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200609u/waldman-interview]) and actual incidents of Muslim on non-Muslim violence. I have the impression that if we list incidents, we're going to find that they've been directed against Jews, and that the perpetrators were in many if not all cases mentally ill. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 00:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:Image:Baburn4.jpg]] == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Baburn4.jpg&diff=87117316&oldid=87109267 This] does not solve the issue regarding [[:Image:Baburn4.jpg]]. The image was tagged with {{t1|no source}} because the source of the image was missing. It still is, so I'm re-tagging it as having the source missing. If you can find it (i.e. provide information about the author or at least year of creation), feel free to add it. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 21:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:The image is, clearly, from the baburnama, which is centuries old, meaning it is public domain.--[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 11:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I have a (translated) copy of the ''Baburnuma'', but could not find the image in there. I see several other pieces of artwork, but this one does not appear to be one of them. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 13:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Islamic extremist terrorism== |
|||
I saw the page on [[Islamic extremist terrorism]]. I'm a little confused, but perhaps you can help me to understand. What's the difference between Islamic moderate extremist terrorism and Islamic extremist terrorism? I would have thought terrorist is by definition, extremism. Please, explain. Thanks, [[User:KazakhPol|KazakhPol]] 00:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Mediation request == |
|||
Hey there, just reminding you that your participation is requested at [[Talk:Muhammad/Mediation]]. At this time, we are trying to achieve consensus on criteria for including depictions of Muhammad, even if they end up in another article (such as [[Depictions of Muhammad]]) or not at all. If we decide not to include them at all, the criteria will be moot, but I think it is important to establish them beforehand. I don't think we can ask anyone to even consider inclusion anywhere if we haven't defined what that means. If you have a problem with the criteria, please suggest changes. --<font color="3300FF">[[User:Aguerriero|Aguerriero]] ([[User_talk:Aguerriero|talk]])</font> 12:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Disaffected A,merican Muslims == |
|||
Tom, your comments on the Islam in the US page -- some of the things for which you want citations are so well-known that requiring citations is kind of ridiculous. However, I'll admit that the section needs more work; I put it there as a placeholder. |
|||
I hope you understand that my intent is to be FAIR. It ''is'' true that some Muslim US residents or citizens have gone past speaking against American policies into actively working against the American government or even committing acts of terrorism. I'm trying to make disinctions between people who held those sentiments before they arrived in the US (carried them in their baggage) and those who grew up here but bought into some of the Qutbi rhetoric. Seems to me that there are vanishingly few brought-up-in-America Qutbis. |
|||
Pointing out that those people exist doesn't mean that I assume all US Muslims are like that. The question seems to be just how representative those folks are. I don't think that they're representative. We just need to present evidence that the vast majority of US Muslims ''don't'' feel that way. That's where your energy should go. [[User:Zora|Zora]] 18:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Blocked for violating revert parole == |
|||
I have blocked you for one week for violating your revert parole on [[Muhammad]]. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 14:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: what are you talking about?--[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<<unblock|I made no revert, I added info>> |
|||
* I reverted once, yes, but not twice in one week. I added info to clarfiy the current status of the hagia sophia, and I made the info on the dome on the rock more specifc, adding info I'm not sure has been present before (Certainly not a revert). There was not two reverts in one week. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=89804183&oldid=89801784 10:20, 24 November 2006] - removing part of caption added by [[User:Opiner]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=86230438&oldid=86227252 07:43, 7 November 2006] |
|||
#[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=89813939&oldid=89807787 12:08, 24 November 2006] removed material about 'having a child with a slave' added by [[User:Sefringle]] on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=89798079&oldid=89794892 09:10, 24 November 2006] |
|||
[[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 15:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: Second is a revert, to which I have previously ackowledged, however, the first is not. Its removal of irrelevent information about a building. It was subsequently removed by someone else after it was '''revert'''ed back in. Thats one revert, not two. --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::It is not a revert, but "removal of irrelevent information about a building?" I do not find that convincing. Maybe someone else will. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 15:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::: So, you are openly saying that there is only one revert? --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 15:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::There are two reverts, as listed above, in violation of the terms of your revert parole. [[User:Tom harrison|Tom Harrison]] <sup>[[User talk:Tom harrison|Talk]]</sup> 16:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::: There is one listed above, as you have said "''It is not a revert''" --[[User:Irishpunktom|Irishpunktom]]\<sup>[[User_talk:Irishpunktom|talk]]</sup> 17:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
I've unblocked you. I see no violation of revert parole. I only see one revert concerning the removal of material about 'having a child with a slave', while the shortening a extraneous caption was clearly balanced with a clarification over something which was never in dispute/contention in the first place. Blocking over this is tantamount to making mountains out of molehills. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">[[User:Netsnipe|'''<span style="background-color:White; color:#003333"> Netsnipe </span>''']][[User talk:Netsnipe|<span style="background-color:#003333; color:White"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 15:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:46, 27 November 2006
Please use the rationale parameter to explain why this user talk page should be deleted. (E.g., {{db-u1|rationale= }}.) Thanks!
Per the User page guidelines, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons. In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libellous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight.
Users who have left Wikipedia may be added to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians.