Talk:Effort optimism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This article has a great start, but there's a few things that could be done in order to improve its content. First, sources should be reformatted to APA style and put under a "references" header rather than a "notes" header. Be mindful of avoiding definite language - we generally want to avoid that in psych. Perhaps expand on the development of effort optimism as a theory, and how individuals come to obtain effort optimism. Additionally, you could look into common critiques of the theory and ways in which to promote effort optimism in disadvantaged or marginalized groups. |
This article has a great start, but there's a few things that could be done in order to improve its content. First, sources should be reformatted to APA style and put under a "references" header rather than a "notes" header. Be mindful of avoiding definite language - we generally want to avoid that in psych. Perhaps expand on the development of effort optimism as a theory, and how individuals come to obtain effort optimism. Additionally, you could look into common critiques of the theory and ways in which to promote effort optimism in disadvantaged or marginalized groups. |
||
[[User:Csuydam11|Csuydam11]] ([[User talk:Csuydam11|talk]]) 04:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC) |
[[User:Csuydam11|Csuydam11]] ([[User talk:Csuydam11|talk]]) 04:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
=== |
|||
That last section is abysmal, no sources, opinion piece, bad grammar. This is the type of thing that makes wikipedia look bad. Can we get somebody with some basic scientific writing knowledge to redo this page? As is it's about high school level. The comment above me has good pointers. |
That last section is abysmal, no sources, opinion piece, bad grammar. This is the type of thing that makes wikipedia look bad. Can we get somebody with some basic scientific writing knowledge to redo this page? As is it's about high school level. The comment above me has good pointers. |
||
Revision as of 13:16, 4 July 2019
 | Psychology Stub‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 02:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Course project edits
I will be editing this article for my Social Psychology class at Simon's Rock. After the final edits, this article will have the meaning of effort optimism, how it relates to Social Psychology, and how this is seen in the modern world. There really aren't many references that are related to this topic, however I have found a couple that can be used. As the article already states now, the main use of this topic is to study the educational gap between majority and minority groups, however, I do believe that another use can be found for it. Zbanihani14 (talk) 20:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Possible Edits
This article has a great start, but there's a few things that could be done in order to improve its content. First, sources should be reformatted to APA style and put under a "references" header rather than a "notes" header. Be mindful of avoiding definite language - we generally want to avoid that in psych. Perhaps expand on the development of effort optimism as a theory, and how individuals come to obtain effort optimism. Additionally, you could look into common critiques of the theory and ways in which to promote effort optimism in disadvantaged or marginalized groups. Csuydam11 (talk) 04:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
=
That last section is abysmal, no sources, opinion piece, bad grammar. This is the type of thing that makes wikipedia look bad. Can we get somebody with some basic scientific writing knowledge to redo this page? As is it's about high school level. The comment above me has good pointers.