Talk:Omega Seamaster: Difference between revisions
Meltingpot (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Naadobea1776 (talk | contribs) →Add new model: new section |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
"This is the beginning of a new generation of watch movements, re-institutionalizing the mechanical movement that once was deemed obsolete by the quartz movement of the 1970s to the present day." It doesn't strike me as being an objective statement. |
"This is the beginning of a new generation of watch movements, re-institutionalizing the mechanical movement that once was deemed obsolete by the quartz movement of the 1970s to the present day." It doesn't strike me as being an objective statement. |
||
[[User:Meltingpot|Meltingpot]] ([[User talk:Meltingpot|talk]]) 20:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC) |
[[User:Meltingpot|Meltingpot]] ([[User talk:Meltingpot|talk]]) 20:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Add new model == |
|||
{{edit request}} |
|||
I have a declared COI on a related subject, and noticed that the recently a recently announced Omega Seamaster model is missing from this list. Please add to the '''models''' section |
|||
* Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wristreview.com/omega-seamaster-planet-ocean-ultra-deep-professional-watch/|title=Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional Becomes the Deepest Diving Watch Ever|website=wristreview.com|access-date=2019-07-07}}</ref> |
|||
Thank you, |
|||
[[User:Naadobea1776|Naadobea1776]] ([[User talk:Naadobea1776|talk]]) 21:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:37, 7 July 2019
![]() | Watches Unassessed | ||||||
|
![]() | Brands Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Antimagnetic
is a (1950s) Seamaster that says "Antimagnetic" on the dial necessarily a fake? -- Cherubino (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Celebrities
The list of celebrity owners in the lead has been picked in order to make the watch look naff - Jeremy Clarkson? Prince William? It's too obvious; people will just dismiss it as lefty trolling. 80.99.56.84 (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement in places
I was thinking of this line in particular;
"This is the beginning of a new generation of watch movements, re-institutionalizing the mechanical movement that once was deemed obsolete by the quartz movement of the 1970s to the present day." It doesn't strike me as being an objective statement. Meltingpot (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Add new model
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Omega Seamaster. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
I have a declared COI on a related subject, and noticed that the recently a recently announced Omega Seamaster model is missing from this list. Please add to the models section
- Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional[1]
Thank you,
Naadobea1776 (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- ^ "Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ultra Deep Professional Becomes the Deepest Diving Watch Ever". wristreview.com. Retrieved 2019-07-07.