Talk:Biba Model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:41, 21 July 2019

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computer Security: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Page added; verified against http://www.itsecurity.com/dictionary/biba.htm. joey h. May. 19, 06:52:05 UTC

Need to add the additional behavioral rules and subsequent proofs. Dthvt 20:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

I'm recommending that Biba Integrity Model be merged to Biba Model since the other related models all follow the "Inventor-Name Model" title convention. Dthvt 21:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. In most security textbooks and literatures the model is simply known as the "Biba Model". Atholas 04:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've started some merger work. Need someone to review or help. Luis F. Gonzalez 05:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Monk" example

How about adapting the "monk" example to a "secret researcher" example like in Bell-LaPadula model? Seems more logic to me.

Actually I think the monks analogy is very easy to understand and remember (learning for exam right now) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.128.196.95 (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's very confusing, since why would a high priest not be able to read what a monk writes? The example does imply a hierarchy and a directed link, but the semantics of the metaphor don't map to reality under experiential analysis. 192.31.106.34 (talk) 13:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added another analogy which further illustrates it. I think someone should pick one or the other in the long run. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.188.243 (talk) 08:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :Actually I think the monks analogy is very easy to understand and remember (learning for exam right now)  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.128.196.95|78.128.196.95]] ([[User talk:78.128.196.95|talk]]) 19:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+::Actually it's very confusing, since why would a high priest not be able to read what a monk writes? The example does imply a hierarchy and a directed link, but the semantics of the metaphor don't map to reality under experiential analysis. [[Special:Contributions/192.31.106.34|192.31.106.34]] ([[User talk:192.31.106.34|talk]]) 13:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 I have added another analogy which further illustrates it.  I think someone should pick one or the other in the long run.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/165.124.188.243|165.124.188.243]] ([[User talk:165.124.188.243|talk]]) 08:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->