User talk:Barok777: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tgeorgescu (talk | contribs) Notifying about suspicion of sockpuppeteering. (TW) |
←Replaced content with 'Helping to balance the hypocrisy with truth. Also - siding with the genuine scholar instead of the snobbish pseudo scholar... Oh empirical evidence where are...' Tag: Replaced |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Helping to balance the hypocrisy with truth. Also - siding with the genuine scholar instead of the snobbish pseudo scholar... Oh empirical evidence where are though when "true" scholars mention themselves in high places... |
|||
== A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful == |
|||
*[[WP:TALK|Please sign your posts on ''talk pages'']] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, found next to the 1 key), and please do not alter other's comments. |
|||
*[[WP:V|"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is]]. |
|||
*[[WP:NOT#OR|We do not publish original thought nor original research]]. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation. |
|||
*[[WP:RS|Reliable sources typically include]]: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). |
|||
*[[WP:NPOV|Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view]]. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are. |
|||
Reformulated: |
|||
*[[WP:V|"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required]]. |
|||
*[[WP:CITE|Always cite a source for any new information]]. When adding this information ''to articles,'' use <nowiki><ref>reference tags like this</ref></nowiki>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable). |
|||
*[[WP:NOT#OR|We do not publish original thought nor original research]]. [[WP:NOTBLOG|We're not a blog]], [[WP:SOAPBOX|we're not here to promote any ideology]]. |
|||
*[[WP:GNG|A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject]]. |
|||
*[[WP:RS|Reliable sources typically include]]: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). |
|||
*[[WP:NPOV|Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view]]. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine. |
|||
*[[WP:DUE|Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited]]. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims. |
|||
*[[WP:GEVAL|We do not give equal validity]] to [[WP:FRINGE|topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia]]. For example, our article on [[Earth]] does not pretend it is [[Flat Earth|flat]], [[Hollow Earth|hollow]], and/or [[Geocentrism|the center of the universe]]. |
|||
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of [[wikt:objective|objective]] information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include [[wikt:subjective|subjective]] information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. [[Indigo children]]). |
|||
You may also want to read [[User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV]]. We at Wikipedia are [[highbrow]] ([http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/magazine/18wwln-domains-t.html?ex=1196139600&en=25f7b166ceba3519&ei=5070&emc=eta1 snobby]), [[WP:ABIAS|heavily biased for the academia]]. |
|||
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is [[WP:CITE|cite]], [[Abstract (summary)|summarize]], and [[paraphrase]] [[WP:RS|professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources]], [[WP:NOR|without addition]], [[WP:NPOV|nor commentary]]. [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY|We're not a directory]], [[WP:NOTFORUM|nor a forum]], [[WP:NOTPROMO|nor a place for you to "spread the word"]]. |
|||
If you are here to [[WP:NOT#PROMO|promote]] pseudoscience, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say. [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 09 July 2019 19:35:02 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia is a secular encyclopaedia == |
|||
Our [[NPOV]] policy means that we do not endorse any religion. Sorry, but if you can't live with that you need to avoid editing anything to do with religion. Thanks. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 10:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:Copy/paste from [[User talk:Mishael707]]. [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 09 July 2019 19:35:02 (UTC) |
|||
== July 2019 == |
|||
[[File:Sock_block.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] '''You are suspected of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]]''', which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#ILLEGIT|prohibited purposes]]. Please make yourself familiar with the [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|guide to responding to investigations]], then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Allenroyboy]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-socksuspect --> [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 20:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Sockpuppet investigation== |
|||
{{bots|deny=HostBot}} |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barok777]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 21:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|||
}} [[User:Tgeorgescu|Tgeorgescu]] ([[User talk:Tgeorgescu|talk]]) 21:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:51, 8 August 2019
Helping to balance the hypocrisy with truth. Also - siding with the genuine scholar instead of the snobbish pseudo scholar... Oh empirical evidence where are though when "true" scholars mention themselves in high places...