User talk:TXTruthFinder: Difference between revisions
→TFVC: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div style="clear: both"></div>[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texans%20for%20Vaccine%20Choice&diff=910815787 this edit]</span> to [[:Texans for Vaccine Choice]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism can result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols|talk]]) 17:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
<div style="clear: both"></div>[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Texans%20for%20Vaccine%20Choice&diff=910815787 this edit]</span> to [[:Texans for Vaccine Choice]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Repeated vandalism can result in the [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-2 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->[[User:Serols|Serols]] ([[User talk:Serols|talk]]) 17:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
There is no reason my edit should be considered vandalism. The original summary should be considered slander, as there is no evidence of an anti-vaccine position, only a neutral position from this group. My sources are legislators who work in Austin within close proximity with this group. |
|||
Furthermore, if a group or person does not have the right to define themselves, then who does? TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== TFVC == |
== TFVC == |
||
Revision as of 17:17, 14 August 2019
August 2019
Hello, I'm Bradv. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Texans for Vaccine Choice seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – bradv🍁 14:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Texans for Vaccine Choice. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
There is no reason my edit should be considered vandalism. The original summary should be considered slander, as there is no evidence of an anti-vaccine position, only a neutral position from this group. My sources are legislators who work in Austin within close proximity with this group.
Furthermore, if a group or person does not have the right to define themselves, then who does? TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
TFVC
There is no reason my edit should be considered vandalism. The original summary should be considered slander, as there is no evidence of an anti-vaccine position, only a neutral position from this group. My sources are legislators who work in Austin within close proximity with this group.
Furthermore, if a group or person does not have the right to define themselves, then who does? TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)