User talk:Vif12vf: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:40, 19 August 2019

Enjoy the Thandai

		A glass of Thandai for you
		Here is a glass of Thandai for you. Thandai is a traditional Indian cold drink prepared with a mixture of almonds, fennel seeds, watermelon kernels, rose petals, pepper, vetiver seeds, cardamom, saffron, milk and sugar. Thanks a lot for your efforts in fighting vandals. It will be helpful to you if you use WP:Twinkle. Because it provides several options that come handy and make it faster to revert vandalism. Try it, I hope you will like it. If you have any questions feel free to ping me. cheers and regards. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 17:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good work with Twinkle, keeping Wikipedia free from Vandalism. Keep it up. Try WP:Stiki as well. cheers. DBig Xrayᗙ 21:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About that IP and the Goguryeo and Balhae talk pages...

Good morning (my time zone). I just blocked the most recent IP used by the editor whose edits you have been reverting at Talk:Goguryeo and Talk:Balhae. Edits such as these [1] [2] have caused him to cross the bright line laid down in WP:No legal threats. Feel free to immediately report any new IP at WP:ANI for that IP to also be blocked. You may reference the block log of 109.239.217.154 and mention that the user has been hopping across multiple IPs, harassing users and issuing legal threats.

Up until about a day ago, I thought it would have been better for you to rebut the claims made by the IP. However, the conduct of the IP has raised enough doubts in my mind that they are commenting on the talk page in good faith that I have reverted their additions. You are probably in the clear to continue reverting; however, it would be a really good idea to report them and note that this user, at other IPs, has already been subject to Wikipedia administrative actions because of this conduct. —C.Fred (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One other thing. If there's some longer-term history of this IP's conduct (i.e., this is a pattern that's been going on a long time), share some diffs with me, so I can see more of the backstory. —C.Fred (talk) 11:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Vif12vf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains^(talk) 01:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Greetings.

Hello Vif12vf: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ 15:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration between us.

--DBig Xrayᗙ 15:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Nice work, comrade. puggo 00:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyvio in a nutshell

Wikipedia is the world's largest free content encyclopedia. As such, it cannot contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content must be removed immediately and completely rewritten and reformatted from scratch. Content published elsewhere copied into Wikipedia must state that it is public domain, licensed under the GFDL, or a creative commons license. That's the simple version. WP:copyright is a vastly complex issue, but if you keep to what I've written you are unlikely to run afoul. I hope you now understand to under no circumstance restore copvio material. Cheers, DlohCierekim 16:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know, the last few weeks have been pretty tiring and i have had much to do, as such i might not always make the best decisions. It is also not the first time lately that i have had to deal with an IP removing large sections of an article, most of what i do is expanding/adding infoboxes and combating vandalism. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. puggo (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You were edit warring about it. I know you are better than that. Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:33, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Socialism

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BGF

I'm not all that familiar with how this works. But as a BGF member in prison, why would a European like you keep deleting facts about my org to the public Jamaa Jamaa (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where you are from or who you are is irrelevant when editing wikipedia, and your edit didn't add anything completely new or relevant information to the article, nor were the edit made correctly. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:38, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute

Hi, I'm Adachineke, I've been receiving messages from you regarding my contributions on the page ‘Indigenous People of Biafra’ I feel intimidated by those messages. Anybody is encouraged to make contributions to Wikipedia pages. You’ve been reverting my update, I don’t know why you have so much interest on IPOB. I don’t think you understand the movement better that I do. Please stop removing my update, thank you.

Your edits include mostly unsourced information and disruptive material. Please read up on wikipedia policy and guidelines before editing further! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vif12vf, I disagree with you, IPOB is not a political party but a movement, a paragraph on that page with reference acknowledge the fact. I only updated the word group to movement and you removed my update. Again, the flag of Biafra is not the flag of a political party but the flag of the defunct Republic of Biafra. I know I'm new to Wikipedia but please stop intimidating me, and warning me that I will be blocked.--Adachineke (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Adachineke: The templated warnings that Vif12vf left on your page are standardized warnings templates. They are not designed to intimidate but to advise users, particularly new users, of the consequences if the continue along the path they're on. IMHO, I'm not convinced your edits are disruptive; however, you (both!) are in jeopardy of violating the three revert rule. I strongly that you leave the article as it was before Adachineke made any changes and discuss the matter at the article's talk page. The goal is to seek a consensus that all (or at least most) editors of the article can agree to. —C.Fred (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Was in the middle of reverting a mass editing spree that had added incorrect information to a number of articles. Thanks for fixing my mistake. W C M_email 18:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, we all have our moments! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Rule Assistance Association

Ryk72 has once again removed content related to Fascism from the IRAA article, even though the reason for it was already explained on the article's talk page, the rationale he is using is that the article text doesn't mention "Fascism", which is something I never saw before on Wikipedia.

He, along with Havsjö, are doing this on other articles as well, using the same rationale, to understand it, Ryk72 a few days ago said that Imperial Japan shouldn't be on the list of right-wing dictatorships because "dictatorship" didn't appear on the article text: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Right-wing_dictatorship#Empire_of_Japan

In other words, even though during 1930s and 1940s (when Imperial Japan became militaristic and Fascist) the Japanese regime arrested many political opponents, had many laws and police organizations in order to do so, it is somehow not a dictatorship just because the text of the article doesn't mention that word.

This is basically the same rationale that is being used to justify those removals, and I doubt this is a legitimate reason to remove content.

I wonder if you could do something about this. -- Pedro8790 (talk) 03:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 03:40, 19 August 2019 edit Pedro8790 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 846 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:40, 19 August 2019 edit undo Pedro8790 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 846 edits →‎Imperial Rule Assistance Association Next edit →
Line 115:		Line 115:
	This is basically the same rationale that is being used to justify those removals, and I doubt this is a legitimate reason to remove content.		This is basically the same rationale that is being used to justify those removals, and I doubt this is a legitimate reason to remove content.

	I wonder if you could do something about this.		I wonder if you could do something about this. -- [[User:Pedro8790\|Pedro8790]] ([[User talk:Pedro8790\|talk]]) 03:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)