Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAUCER: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete |
m Credible source →SAUCER |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' per nomination, it's been a chore to keep the blatant product marketing out of this, and with that removed there's not much left for an article. I can find nothing substantial about the company online in [[WP:RS]], just photos on social media of a few people wearing their logo. [[User:Tracy Von Doom|Tracy Von Doom]] ([[User talk:Tracy Von Doom|talk]]) 16:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nomination, it's been a chore to keep the blatant product marketing out of this, and with that removed there's not much left for an article. I can find nothing substantial about the company online in [[WP:RS]], just photos on social media of a few people wearing their logo. [[User:Tracy Von Doom|Tracy Von Doom]] ([[User talk:Tracy Von Doom|talk]]) 16:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
Hi Tracy, I have included another source to establish credibility. SAUCER was mentioned in the OC Weekly paper this month so I added that in. |
|||
Revision as of 20:03, 24 August 2019
SAUCER
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SAUCER (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article currently sources to the company's website, a few social media posts, and some random websites/news sites that happen to have a picture showing someone wearing one of their products - nothing that approaches WP:CORPDEPTH. I can't find any independent sourcing online, so appears to fail WP:NCORP. GirthSummit (blether) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 14:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, it's been a chore to keep the blatant product marketing out of this, and with that removed there's not much left for an article. I can find nothing substantial about the company online in WP:RS, just photos on social media of a few people wearing their logo. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Tracy, I have included another source to establish credibility. SAUCER was mentioned in the OC Weekly paper this month so I added that in.