Talk:Akatsuki (Naruto): Difference between revisions
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
::::::::Gaara vs. Sasuke is coming this month, and episode 67 is set for 12/23, so we will know the English translation soon enough. [[User:Treima|Treima]] 04:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
::::::::Gaara vs. Sasuke is coming this month, and episode 67 is set for 12/23, so we will know the English translation soon enough. [[User:Treima|Treima]] 04:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
It's true that Maito Gai is a katakana translation of Might Guy, but if Masashi had intended for Gai's name to truly be "Might Guy", I believe he would've settled for something like "Seiryoku Gai"... Personally, I still think that he choosed "Maito Gai" because it would be a clear referance to his strong character, but that's just me... Rasengan = Power Strike? And how many hate letters does the dubbers get each day? I'm a member of the movement that emphasizes the use of original names, both character, techniques and other things alike, instead of dubbed versions of them. |
Revision as of 13:09, 1 December 2006
![]() | Anime and manga Redirect‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Akatsuki (Naruto). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Akatsuki (Naruto) at the Reference desk. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Akatsuki (Naruto) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
![]() | Akatsuki (Naruto) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | Akatsuki (Naruto) was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: Error: Invalid time.. |
![]() Archives |
---|
Naruto Hurricane Chronicles
When N.H.C. comes out does that mean we'll be under N.H.C. or Naruto or both? Also will have to move some characters (when they get their own articles that is) will be under N.H.C. and others won't? Where will Itachi and Kisame be at. I'll help any way I can (looks like I'll have to wait to ask for a Hidan article until after all this B.S. is over).Sam ov the blue sand 17:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hidan won't need an article unless he gets a ton of backstory and/or survives the current battle and goes on to do something important. Nemu 17:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I know that and that wasn't my question my question is about N.H.C.Sam ov the blue sand 18:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're talking about. We won't have to move any characters in this article if that's what you're asking. The Splendiferous Gegiford 18:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- (sigh) What I'm trying to say is that when every member has his or her own article, are they going to be under Naruto Hurricane Chronicles (which will probaly have it's own article like DBZ) or under Naruto. Sorry if I confused you with my onslaught of questions.Sam ov the blue sand 19:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- It's the same basic series in the manga, so it won't really matter. And what do you mean "under"? The Splendiferous Gegiford 19:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I know that it's the same basic series in the manga so was DBZ but it has it's own article because it's considered a diffferent series and Naruto Hurricane Chronicles will be considered a different anime series apart from Naruto, so it will have it's own article. And what I mean "under" is where will the members (from akatsuki) be at, Naruto Hurricane Chronicles or Naruto because some are exclusive to Naruto Hurricane Chronicles and others aren't.Sam ov the blue sand 19:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- They aren't going to be moved to a different article just for the anime's sake if that's what you're asking; there won't be a Naruto Akatsuki page and a Hurricane Akatsuki page. At best, there'll be a single sentence saying they appear only in the Hurricane Chronicles, and that'll be it. ~SnapperTo
- Well at least someone gets what I'm saying but I'm not talking about the Akatsuki page I'm talking about akatsuki member articles like Sasori's article where will he go, Naruto or N.H.C.Sam ov the blue sand 20:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nowhere. They're the same series. It's just a timeskip. One sentence explaining that fact is all that will be added. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Technacly when N.H.C. comes out it won't be the same series.Sam ov the blue sand 20:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- "Technically" it will be the same series. Same characters (mostly), same setting, same overall plot. We're not going to be shuffing around every character into different places when the manga and anime essentially follow the same path. This isn't like Dragon Ball where the anime breaks apart the content and retitles it several times. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- OK whatever you say Someguy.Sam ov the blue sand 00:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- "Technically" it will be the same series. Same characters (mostly), same setting, same overall plot. We're not going to be shuffing around every character into different places when the manga and anime essentially follow the same path. This isn't like Dragon Ball where the anime breaks apart the content and retitles it several times. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Technacly when N.H.C. comes out it won't be the same series.Sam ov the blue sand 20:20, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nowhere. They're the same series. It's just a timeskip. One sentence explaining that fact is all that will be added. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well at least someone gets what I'm saying but I'm not talking about the Akatsuki page I'm talking about akatsuki member articles like Sasori's article where will he go, Naruto or N.H.C.Sam ov the blue sand 20:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- They aren't going to be moved to a different article just for the anime's sake if that's what you're asking; there won't be a Naruto Akatsuki page and a Hurricane Akatsuki page. At best, there'll be a single sentence saying they appear only in the Hurricane Chronicles, and that'll be it. ~SnapperTo
- Yes I know that it's the same basic series in the manga so was DBZ but it has it's own article because it's considered a diffferent series and Naruto Hurricane Chronicles will be considered a different anime series apart from Naruto, so it will have it's own article. And what I mean "under" is where will the members (from akatsuki) be at, Naruto Hurricane Chronicles or Naruto because some are exclusive to Naruto Hurricane Chronicles and others aren't.Sam ov the blue sand 19:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- It's the same basic series in the manga, so it won't really matter. And what do you mean "under"? The Splendiferous Gegiford 19:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- (sigh) What I'm trying to say is that when every member has his or her own article, are they going to be under Naruto Hurricane Chronicles (which will probaly have it's own article like DBZ) or under Naruto. Sorry if I confused you with my onslaught of questions.Sam ov the blue sand 19:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're talking about. We won't have to move any characters in this article if that's what you're asking. The Splendiferous Gegiford 18:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- I know that and that wasn't my question my question is about N.H.C.Sam ov the blue sand 18:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Kakuzu
Has anyone read the latest chapter? (333) Should some mention be made of what's happened? -Retlor
- Yes, I think it should... After all, it's all definite fact now, why should it not be included straight away?
- It's already in there. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- At the end of some manga translations it says that "Kakuzu is finished only Hidan remains" or something like that, depends on where you get it from. Should it be added that he might possibly be deceased?Sam ov the blue sand 21:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- We don't deal in possibles. He's either dead or he isn't. Right now, he isn't. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- But on Asuma's page when he was possibly killed they put (deceased)? next to his age, shouldn't we do the same? Sam ov the blue sand 22:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- You're mistaken. That was added when he was confirmed to be dead, not before. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well if you say so, but I still think I saw it on Asuma's page before hand. Ah never mind.Sam ov the blue sand)Template:Emot 22:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- If I remember correctly, it was put on his page before the raw of chapter 328 was out because several sources had confirmed that Asuma was dead in that chapter. It was only added the day before the full raw came out, though. The Splendiferous Gegiford 00:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well if you say so, but I still think I saw it on Asuma's page before hand. Ah never mind.Sam ov the blue sand)Template:Emot 22:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Should Kakuzu's entry be editted to clarify that he can completely separate his limbs where they are attatched by those black rope like tenticles? its clearly shown in 333 that they move on their own when detatched. as it is now its a tad ambiguous. Xeago Xeago 00:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- They were underground, not moving on their own. Kakuzu remained connected to them the entire time. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- It does happen. It also helps to get a better quality scan mid-discussion. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I think Xeago is right... Kakuzu's arm seemes to be severed from the rest of him if you look closely on page 5-6... The "threads" that extends from Kakuzu's hand doesn't reconnect with his arm until page 6... On the other hand (no pun intended), we should not put things up just because of their appearence but only as they truly ARE.
- Look closely at those pages. Specifically, read the bottom left panel on 5. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actaully, on close inspection, I hadn't noticed that Kakuzu was standing up beforehand. I guess he can control them remotely. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 00:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's right... Don't just judge by the text (from a fan dub above all), a picture can say more than a thousand words... Wait a second, does this mean that Someguy is admitting defeat? I don't think I've EVER experienced that before... This is totally weird o_O!
- Helps to get a better scan halfway through. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Issue 333, page 4. You see Kakuzu's Sleeve partialy cut off by Hidan's 3xScyth, no tendrils, no connection to Kakuzu. Page 4, the arm is shown snatching the trench knife out of the shadow (top of page), then it tosses it aside and hits the ground (much like you do when you get up). There is a pool of the black tendril stuff that comes out of the ground with no connection to Kakuzu shown. It then flies back to Kakuzu through the air (bottom of page 5), not back underground. If it was still connected at that point it would have had to do more damage to the ground between K. and the Trench Knife. Also, there are tendrils come out of the goo that are not connected to the hand, I think that this can mean two things: first, that the limbs cannot move themselves, but rather that the goo animates the limbs, and two, that the goo is actuly blood. My hypothesis (which will never see main page until it's proven or disproven) is that like Sasori, Kakuzu has sacrificed much of his humanity for the power that he has. This follows the deep running theme of the Akatsuki, and if I am right, Kakuzu not only survived the attack by Kakashi, but also is forced to show his true form. I expect to see at least a couple more issues with battle between them before either Hidan or Kakuzu are incapacitated.65.92.233.87 02:56, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, that last one was me. Still getting the hang of it.Xeago 02:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've already changed my position, but that's a good analysis (the first half of it, anyway) for anyone else questioning it. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Once again, Xeago and I think alike, but I believe that Kakuzu's ability is more like Kidoumaru's web skills IE. He mixes chakra into his blood and then remotly controls his detatced limbs with the chakra flow thoughout them... Actully, I've had the theory that Kakuzu and Hidan are mirror images of eachother... Think about it, Hidan is a religious fanatic, Kakuzu is a obsessive materialist, Hidan is a loud bigmouth, Kakuzu is down to earth and reserved, Hidan is immortal but rather weak and vaunrable in general, Kakuzu is mortal but he is strong and nearly indestructable... See any patterns here?
Future changes?
When the english dub of the anime introduces us to the akatsuki and if they choose to name Akatsuki, "dawn" or sunrise", will this article change name into said name then? Like what happened to Maito Gai's article where he is called "Might Guy"?
- First off, Might Guy is Might Guy. "Maito Gai" is nothing but an accented Japanese pronounciation. Second, we'll cross that road when we come to it. However, you can be reasonably certain that like with virtually every other orgainzation, they'll keep this name the same. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I may be wrong again but haven't they said Akatsuki before in the anime at the end of the series?Sam ov the blue sand 03:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Not in the English dub they haven't. Treima 03:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well I was wrong again, but I don't think they'll change the name to Dawn or Sunrise it wouldn't sound right.Sam ov the blue sand 03:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so either, if only because there is official merchandise out there available in the States that say Akatsuki in Romaji. But, who knows. They were willing to call Rasengan "Power Strike", possibly the dumbest translation they could have possibly come up with, so I won't be surprised either way. Treima 03:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow there calling Rasengan "Power Strike" that sounds gay, so what are they calling Chidori?Sam ov the blue sand 03:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Chidori, but that's in the games and they don't count. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's good I got worried there for a second.Sam ov the blue sand 03:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Gaara vs. Sasuke is coming this month, and episode 67 is set for 12/23, so we will know the English translation soon enough. Treima 04:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
It's true that Maito Gai is a katakana translation of Might Guy, but if Masashi had intended for Gai's name to truly be "Might Guy", I believe he would've settled for something like "Seiryoku Gai"... Personally, I still think that he choosed "Maito Gai" because it would be a clear referance to his strong character, but that's just me... Rasengan = Power Strike? And how many hate letters does the dubbers get each day? I'm a member of the movement that emphasizes the use of original names, both character, techniques and other things alike, instead of dubbed versions of them.