Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquipel: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:53, 12 September 2019

Liquipel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability criteria laid out at WP:ORGCRIT specifically the in-depth coverage required, not just a few industry trade rag mentions or nn awards. The only thing coming close to coverage in a big-name RS is the Popular Science "gadgets award" (the one labeled LA Times is actually their blog platform) and that's not sufficient to sustain an article. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing comes close to WP:ORGCRIT. In fact, even Popular Science award isn't close to ORGCRIT. It may be a good company, but the references do not add up to notability for Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 01:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.
Delete - per nomination - MA Javadi (talk) 21:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination context.Abtehas98 (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *'''Delete''' Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and [[WP:NCORP]].
 * '''Delete''' - per nomination - [[User:MA Javadi|MA Javadi]] ([[User talk:MA Javadi|talk]]) 21:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
+* '''Delete''' per nomination context.[[User:Abtehas98|Abtehas98]] ([[User talk:Abtehas98|talk]]) 18:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)