Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinehouse Photography Club: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:29, 16 October 2019

Pinehouse Photography Club

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a local club, created by the person who runs is. Sources are some local coverage. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG Melcous (talk) 22:15, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Article about a local club, created by the person who runs is. Sources are some local coverage. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG~~ The "local" club has got national headlines and coverage across Canada. Mallory Lariveire runs it, I am a nurse at the local clinic here. Numerous supporting therapeutic photography clubs now exist nation wide. Sources are National and local, including CBC: the National, Global National, and a documentary that won national awards. --Dreerwin (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG; the subject appears to be on only local interest. The author clearly has a conflict of interest. Luke^Talk 23:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- There is over 42,000 people across social media who follow and support the club across the country. The local interest is more of a national one about youth suicides in the north and mental health prevention, unlikely a "local" issue but a national problem the club is trying to resolve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 23:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT Delete Does not Fail WP:GNG The club has nothing to do with myself but the youth in the club and the club itself, a club I am not even a part of. I am a primary care nurse at the clinic in Pinehouse. The club is on the other side of town, run by their director of operations Mallory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 23:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I see what I did wrong...I shouldnt have had myself linked to the page. I removed that part and added more references. Any help to make it better would greatly be appreciated thanks guys! Dre — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 00:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Appears to be notable. Unsure on local interest guidelines, though. So, for now, I'll say ~~Weak keep~~. Doug Mehus (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Ive updated more links added pictures..Im learning here actually enjoying this. I guess I'll just add more content and references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 02:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've changed my vote. The article is well cited. Formatting of citations could be improved to include name of publisher instead of just domain name, but that's minor. Some images may not be needed and I would encourage User:Dreerwin to look at WP:ER whereby she would propose in the page's Talk page what she would like to edit and have another editor peer review it, if she is works for, is on the board of, or a close friend or family member of anyone involved with this club. As to local restrictions on articles, I'm not aware of any. It appears locally notable to me. Doug Mehus (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Im sorry I thought I didnt add them or save the pics so frustratingly I added them again, not realizing they were removed for a reason...sorry about that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 12:46, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Can I/ew removed this now: This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (October 2019) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. (October 2019) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreerwin (talk • contribs) 15:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment resolved meeting WP:GNG and removed conflict of interest - knowing more about the club I dont think is a conflict of interest. I am a nurse. I work at a clinic seeing patients and responding to emergencies. My job has nothing to do with the photography club, but I do know and see the impact it is making indirectly with youth. I believe there is enough credible references to show the national implication and impact. Wondering what next? — Preceding unsigned comment added by dreerwin (talk • contribs) 01:12, October 12, 2019 (UTC)
Keep dreerwin —Preceding undated comment added 01:12, 12 October 2019 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: dreerwin (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
- Comment removed warnings clealy meets WP:GNG now. Needed more time to finish. As per WP:GNG, If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." "Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe cases." — Preceding unsigned comment added by dreerwin (talk • contribs) 13:54, October 12, 2019 (UTC)
Keep Appears to be notable with no conflict of interest as information all well cited/no room for biass. Revert/keep/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halkett99 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC) — halkett99 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep, meets WP:GNG, the WP:THREE are: CBCNews, Globalnews.ca, and Sask Polytec. Granted that third one is an alumni magazine, not the best RS. Here's a shorter piece from a radio station. There is also additional follow-up coverage from CBC [1] and Globalnews [2]. A GNG hardliner might not agree there are three in there, but the first two, without a doubt, are WP:SIGCOV, and so I think it meets the "multiple" requirement of GNG. – Levivich 16:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG heard of this on National news. Relevant add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.165.223.143 (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC) — 142.165.223.143 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep Appears to be notable and credible with no conflict of interest. ~Verna Mogk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.78.110.58 (talk) 17:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC) — 24.78.110.58 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- CommentMelcous WP:GNG often stresses not to attack or put blame on others, look for solutions before nominating a page for deletion. It also mentions cyberbullying and harassment. look at this comment she made on someones Page: "Hello, Halkett99, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Dreerwin" . Thanks for adding the ballot too now ;) --Dreerwin (talk) 23:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG. Lightburst (talk) 01:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per comments, article possess notability. Barca (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Personally not wholly convinced this will have any lasting notability. But seem to have enough now to pass.Slatersteven (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:NOTTEMPORARY wp:NTEMP but I dunno I am new here lol...thank you for understanding --Dreerwin (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 *'''Keep''' Per comments, article possess notability. [[User:BarcrMac|Barca]] ([[User talk:BarcrMac|talk]]) 22:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 *'''Weak Keep''' Personally not wholly convinced this will have any lasting notability. But seem to have enough now to pass.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 14:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
+** '''Comment''' [[WP:NOTTEMPORARY]] [[wp:NTEMP]] but I dunno I am new here lol...thank you for understanding --[[User:Dreerwin|Dreerwin]] ([[User talk:Dreerwin|talk]]) 15:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)