Jump to content

User talk:Captainkang: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
435 Info
No edit summary
Line 30: Line 30:
== 435 Info ==
== 435 Info ==


It would have connected 43 in Sandy to 5 outside of Ravenna. I see you've worked on some articles in the Stark Co. area. If you have interest in urban planning try to get a copy of the book I got the highway plan from, it's available from Akron's Bierce Library. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:UltraSkuzzi|UltraSkuzzi]] ([[User talk:UltraSkuzzi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/UltraSkuzzi|contribs]]) 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
It would have connected 43 in Sandy to 5 outside of Ravenna. I see you've worked on some articles in the Stark Co. area. If you have interest in urban planning try to get a copy of the book I got the highway plan from, it's available from Akron's Bierce Library.--[[User:UltraSkuzzi|UltraSkuzzi]] 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


:About US 30, I think I read in the repository that the whole US 30 freeway plan has been scrapped. What disturbs me more about the 1985 plan is how US 62 was never converted to limited access, that thing is a nightmare.
== 435 Info ==

It would have connected 43 in Sandy to 5 outside of Ravenna. I see you've worked on some articles in the Stark Co. area. If you have interest in urban planning try to get a copy of the book I got the highway plan from, it's available from Akron's Bierce Library.--[[User:UltraSkuzzi|UltraSkuzzi]] 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:06, 5 December 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Captainkang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 08:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stark1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stark1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Township Nav Boxes

Thanks for your work on Township nav boxes for Mahoning, Stark, Summit and Trumbull Counties, in Ohio. However, I would suggest / argue strongly in favor of making Nav Boxes for the whole county (i.e. all cities, villages, townships, and census-designated places) and not just townships.

For examples of two styles of county nav boxes, see Northumberland County, Pennsylvania and Alameda County, California. I prefer the former style. There is a discussion on this starting at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. counties if you are interested. Yours, Ruhrfisch 03:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. The nav boxes do repeat information (as do info boxes), but I think it is useful to have the info in both places. For longer articles, the nav box comes at the bottom and so it is not as obvious that the info is repeated. The PA County nav boxes are also on every city, borough, township, and census-designated place article for that county, so even though they duplicate the info on the county page, they do not duplicate it on the other pages. I would also list all the Townships on each Ohio county article (not all Ohio Counties do yet). Thanks, Ruhrfisch 04:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Summit County, Ohio nav box looks nice - thanks. I put one on Hancock County, Ohio and the articles for all cities, villages and townships but I can't find the county seal (so I used the Ohio seal). Ruhrfisch 17:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

435 Info

It would have connected 43 in Sandy to 5 outside of Ravenna. I see you've worked on some articles in the Stark Co. area. If you have interest in urban planning try to get a copy of the book I got the highway plan from, it's available from Akron's Bierce Library.--UltraSkuzzi 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About US 30, I think I read in the repository that the whole US 30 freeway plan has been scrapped. What disturbs me more about the 1985 plan is how US 62 was never converted to limited access, that thing is a nightmare.