Jump to content

User talk:OhKayeSierra: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Siihb (talk | contribs)
Question.: new section
Line 96: Line 96:
</div></div> <section end="technews-2019-W43"/> 14:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
</div></div> <section end="technews-2019-W43"/> 14:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19479627 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19479627 -->

== Question. ==

Why comment on a discussion you have nothing to do with, and you aren't an admin? Are you just someone who dislikes anyone who wants to bring up Spez's changing comments on reddit? I dont much like the community he did it to either, but it was still a major scandal covered by numerous sources. It deserves to have its own section just like Lauer's allegations (unlike Spez's admission of guilt) do on his page. That keeps both pages in line with Wikipedia standards.

Revision as of 06:47, 27 October 2019

15:36, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

MaxTCC (talk) 20:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)== MaxTCC ==[reply]

MaxTCC disclosure of working for Candid Camera (Peter Funt) has been noted on the Webpage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxTCC (talkcontribs) 20:23, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

On your Teahouse host profile, specifically after the wikilink to Theatre, there isn't a period. Since "Please" is capitalized, was this a typo? I thought I should let you know in case it was and you wanted to fix it. Clovermoss (talk) 21:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Clovermoss: Thanks for the heads-up about my typo! I went ahead and fixed it. That's what I get for editing in the middle of the night. 😬 OhKayeSierra (talk) 00:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been mentioned on the talk page at child sexual abuse requesting that you respond with respect to clarifying your denial of an edit request there. If you fail to reasonably respond, I will have no choice but to remove your denial of the request in its entirety and resubmit the request as a new semi-protected edit request. 66.90.153.184 (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@66.90.153.184: I saw your edit request when you added it. I elected to abstain from handling your edit request further, and to let another willing user handle it, should they feel inclined to do so. It doesn't look like anyone has been willing to handle it, though. Please note that, per WP:TPG, it's almost always frowned upon to reformat or refactor other user's talk page comments. You're more than welcome to resubmit your request, but I ask that you not delete other's edits from the talk page. OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. I was for a moment thinking you weren't aware of the mention, not so much of a big deal if you think you should abstain from handing the issue, which is fine with me. And as to the other thing- I wasn't aware there was any set policy on that- thanks for clarifying that point. 66.90.153.184 (talk) 23:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Question.

Why comment on a discussion you have nothing to do with, and you aren't an admin? Are you just someone who dislikes anyone who wants to bring up Spez's changing comments on reddit? I dont much like the community he did it to either, but it was still a major scandal covered by numerous sources. It deserves to have its own section just like Lauer's allegations (unlike Spez's admission of guilt) do on his page. That keeps both pages in line with Wikipedia standards.