Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan Joynul: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
withdrawing speedy keep and leaving to community as possibly overriden by admin |
Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) Removing manual link to CAT:AFD - the "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE" template already adds the debate to the appropriate category |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. '''~[[User:~riley|<span style="color:#232323;">''riley''</span>]]''' ''(<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">[[User talk:~riley|<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">talk</span>]]</span>)'' 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. '''~[[User:~riley|<span style="color:#232323;">''riley''</span>]]''' ''(<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">[[User talk:~riley|<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">talk</span>]]</span>)'' 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bangladesh|list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions]]. '''~[[User:~riley|<span style="color:#232323;">''riley''</span>]]''' ''(<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">[[User talk:~riley|<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">talk</span>]]</span>)'' 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bangladesh|list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions]]. '''~[[User:~riley|<span style="color:#232323;">''riley''</span>]]''' ''(<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">[[User talk:~riley|<span style="color:#4F4F4F;">talk</span>]]</span>)'' 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
[[Category:AfD debates]] |
|||
*'''Comment''': Courtesy ping to {{u|RHaworth}} as his alleged ''bad habits'' have been brought up at this AfD but I'm not sure he's been made aware of it and it ''might'' be behind his back. The AfD nom. has previously raised invalid CSD {{diff|Khan Joynul|930887140|930886416}} which creator had removed and seemingly an edit war ensued. Nom didn't inform creator of AfD but creator has found it anyway. Nom has also failed to sign this AfD.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 09:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''': Courtesy ping to {{u|RHaworth}} as his alleged ''bad habits'' have been brought up at this AfD but I'm not sure he's been made aware of it and it ''might'' be behind his back. The AfD nom. has previously raised invalid CSD {{diff|Khan Joynul|930887140|930886416}} which creator had removed and seemingly an edit war ensued. Nom didn't inform creator of AfD but creator has found it anyway. Nom has also failed to sign this AfD.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 09:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
*''''Neutral''' (withdrawing this !vote and leaving to consensus ... probably ) <s>'''Speedy keep''': (Technical) per [[WP:SKCRIT]] <s>a:2</s> 2:a [[Frivolous or vexatious]] nom. after edit war dispute following a [[WP:CSD]] raised with no valid criteria.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 09:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)</s> (This !vote from oldid=931005937 is restored after being nuked by RHaworth for now reasons .. probably accidently on edit edit conflict ... I have said what I have said on a log be it right or wrong or stupid or whatever and it should not probably be deleted unless there is a very good reason even if restoring it gets me in my usual trouble or blocked. Thankyou [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 11:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)) |
*''''Neutral''' (withdrawing this !vote and leaving to consensus ... probably ) <s>'''Speedy keep''': (Technical) per [[WP:SKCRIT]] <s>a:2</s> 2:a [[Frivolous or vexatious]] nom. after edit war dispute following a [[WP:CSD]] raised with no valid criteria.[[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 09:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)</s> (This !vote from oldid=931005937 is restored after being nuked by RHaworth for now reasons .. probably accidently on edit edit conflict ... I have said what I have said on a log be it right or wrong or stupid or whatever and it should not probably be deleted unless there is a very good reason even if restoring it gets me in my usual trouble or blocked. Thankyou [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 11:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 15:35, 16 December 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Khan Joynul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Joynul Stats)
Not a notable person, this article is already deleted once but recreated by the author. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment As, I am the creater I have to say something. When it was deleted it had around 5 references. I was not online then. It was deleted by User:RHaworth (He deleted pages like Maya Rani Paul, Jogesh Chandra Barman and Narayan Rao Tarale which were created by mine. I think he has a bad habits in deleting stub articles. This time I did not knock him as he replied late that my experience say so I recreate it). I can provide you only one English source (Comedy stars through the ages). If you think, an article having lack of non English sources should be deleted, you can delete it and vote for delete. And if you think a country's legendary comedian's article should be kept on Wikipedia, you can keep it and vote for keep. Thanks. -- S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Equally, Nazmus, you have bad habits in creating short stub articles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~riley (talk) 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~riley (talk) 19:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Courtesy ping to RHaworth as his alleged bad habits have been brought up at this AfD but I'm not sure he's been made aware of it and it might be behind his back. The AfD nom. has previously raised invalid CSD [1] which creator had removed and seemingly an edit war ensued. Nom didn't inform creator of AfD but creator has found it anyway. Nom has also failed to sign this AfD.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- 'Neutral (withdrawing this !vote and leaving to consensus ... probably )
Speedy keep: (Technical) per WP:SKCRIT(This !vote from oldid=931005937 is restored after being nuked by RHaworth for now reasons .. probably accidently on edit edit conflict ... I have said what I have said on a log be it right or wrong or stupid or whatever and it should not probably be deleted unless there is a very good reason even if restoring it gets me in my usual trouble or blocked. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC))a:22:a Frivolous or vexatious nom. after edit war dispute following a WP:CSD raised with no valid criteria.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC) - Comment: It is comes down to WP:RS and there's a reliance on foreign language sources I would suggest as a minimum the author or other interested parties elaborate the article cites ensuring trans-title,last,first,date,website,lang (or equivalents) are all populated where possible and three best are presented per WP:THREE suggestion. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)(This comment from oldid=931005937 is restored after being nuked by RHaworth for now reasons .. probably accidently on edit edit conflict ... I have said what I have said on a log be it right or wrong or stupid or whatever and it should not probably be deleted unless there is a very good reason even if restoring it gets me in my usual trouble or blocked. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC))
- Keep. The claim of "legendary" is probably true. Let us hope that someone will go to the trouble of finding paper sources, ie. newspaper articles, etc. from the guy's heyday. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)