Jump to content

User talk:NedFausa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 28: Line 28:
Even though I think my evidence is strong, I also will not place any COI tags on the article or anyone's page either.
Even though I think my evidence is strong, I also will not place any COI tags on the article or anyone's page either.
[[User:Wekeepwhatwekill|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">'''Necromonger...'''</span>]][[User_talk:Wekeepwhatwekill|<span style=";text-shadow:Grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">''We keep what we kill'']]</span> 13:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
[[User:Wekeepwhatwekill|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">'''Necromonger...'''</span>]][[User_talk:Wekeepwhatwekill|<span style=";text-shadow:Grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">''We keep what we kill'']]</span> 13:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

== Removing Alexey Guzey's research from Why We Sleep? ==

Hiya. I appreciate your devotion to [[WP:RS]] related to [[Why We Sleep]], but do you realize that the citation and statement you removed had explicit research, as well as cited journal articles behind it? The entire debate around the book was _started_ by this researcher. Removing this changes the factual accuracy of the article negatively (by removing the credit for the person who started the debate), and devalues the statements associated. Statements should not be removed simply because they come from people who aren't field insiders. Wikipedia is collaborative, and by definition, many of the editors do not have field-specific credentials. [[User:NicatronTg|Lucas &#34;nicatronTg&#34; Nicodemus]] ([[User talk:NicatronTg|talk]]) 20:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:35, 30 December 2019

In the future, machines will speak for us but there will be no one left to listen.

Ellipses

Hey Ned, just a heads up, per the manual of style here on Wikipedia, we don't use the pre-formed ellipses character. I undid your edit that seemed to just be the ellipsis stuff, but didn't check to see if you made that change anywhere else. Cheers, Nole (chat·edits) 17:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 12:59, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Jewish American journalists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open Technology Fund

Ned, Please don't try to place the disputed content back in. That's possibly the worst thing that you could do. Yes, you , I and Drmies believe this content isn't BLP. Gamaliel and Cellarpaper believe otherwise. That's not really consensus. Also , be aware that I've contacted a functionary on Wikipedia about a COI that I believe one of that participants on the page has about this subject. I won't say who or give any details on Wikipedia as some information isn't available on Wikipedia and could be considered outing. I'm waiting to hear from the functionary about this.

That said - PLEASE DO NOT place any COI tags in that article, as the COI is suspected as this point, not proven, also don't place any COI tags on anyone's page either for the same reason. Even though I think my evidence is strong, I also will not place any COI tags on the article or anyone's page either. Necromonger...We keep what we kill 13:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Alexey Guzey's research from Why We Sleep?

Hiya. I appreciate your devotion to WP:RS related to Why We Sleep, but do you realize that the citation and statement you removed had explicit research, as well as cited journal articles behind it? The entire debate around the book was _started_ by this researcher. Removing this changes the factual accuracy of the article negatively (by removing the credit for the person who started the debate), and devalues the statements associated. Statements should not be removed simply because they come from people who aren't field insiders. Wikipedia is collaborative, and by definition, many of the editors do not have field-specific credentials. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]