User talk:Spartaz: Difference between revisions
→DRV: new section |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Deletion review for [[Cristian Pache]] == |
== Deletion review for [[Cristian Pache]] == |
||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Cristian Pache|deletion review]] of [[Cristian Pache]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> [[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|talk]]) 09:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Cristian Pache|deletion review]] of [[Cristian Pache]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> [[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|talk]]) 09:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
Please restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the {{TempUndelete}} template, leaving the history for review by non-admins. thanks --[[Special:Contributions/2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3]] ([[User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3|talk]]) 09:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:11, 2 January 2020
Archive 1 * Archive 2 * Archive 3 * Archive 4 * Archive 5 * Archive 6 * Archive 7 * Archive 8 * Archive 9 * Archive 10 * Archive 11 * Archive 12 * Archive 13 * Archive 14 * Archive 15 * Archive 16 * Archive 17 * Archive 18 * Archive 19 * Archive 20 * Archive 21 * Archive 22 * Archive 23 * Archive 24 * Archive 25 * Archive 26 |
Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
I'm a long term user (first edit 2006) and have been an admin on or off since 2017. That makes me a bit stuck in my ways but I have the benefit of experience and working through many of the changes that have left us where we are. I am getting grumpy. Sorry but all the drama and grief has washed away a lot of my younger idealism...
A BLP is a serious matter and needs to be properly sourced.
I mostly work on deletion discussions. I am willing to userfy deleted articles for improvement as long as there is a reasonable likelihood that they can be saved. If you are challenging a deletion, do you have three good sources? Also, don’t waste your time asking me to review a close or you are going to DRV because I’m not going to review a close with a sword hanging over my head. Just raise the DRV or ask someone else.
Useful Links:
- Please don't leave talkback templates as I always watchlist pages when I edit and I'm perfectly capable of looking for a reply myself.
You may want to increment {{Archive basics}} to |counter= 25
as User talk:Spartaz/Archive24 is larger than the recommended 150Kb.
About Great Spider
Hi Spartaz,
As you can see (with our magical sysop spectacles) this article has been recreated by Marino73 using bits of the article deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jba fofi.
I'm leery of an outright WP:G4 tag, given the WP:Good Faithyness categorical imperative. What do you think would be the best way to deal with this?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- I think you should send it to afd and link the previous discussion. Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 20:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
DRV
Deletion review for Cristian Pache
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cristian Pache. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3 (talk) 09:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Please restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the
This page was deleted from Wikipedia because an administrator believed either that a consensus was reached among editors that it is unsuitable as an encyclopedia entry or that it met one or more conditions for speedy deletion. However, an appeal has been made at Deletion Review to restore the page. To facilitate that discussion, the page has been temporarily restored with this message in place. If you would like to see the article that was deleted, please check its history. You may wish to contribute to the Deletion Review discussion following your inspection. Please do not edit this page until the Deletion Review is completed and an administrator has removed this notice. |
template, leaving the history for review by non-admins. thanks --2604:2000:E010:1100:6C0E:DE1F:73EE:4BF3 (talk) 09:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)