Talk:Chris Ofili: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Typewriter (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
How relevant is to mention this with regard to the specific episode? One would need a quite strong and particular link to offset the obvious NPOV potential bias and clear promotion of the non directly related commercial interest of the book writer. |
How relevant is to mention this with regard to the specific episode? One would need a quite strong and particular link to offset the obvious NPOV potential bias and clear promotion of the non directly related commercial interest of the book writer. |
||
I totally agree and changed the reference to make it at least more NPOV. In the end, I would vote for removal. |
|||
[[User:Typewriter|Typewriter]] 16:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:30, 11 December 2006
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
Black Madonna - religious protest
Why doesn't this article discuss how, after the insult to the Virgin Mary, Catholics around the world were rioting and burning British embassies?
Anon user: 141.151.182.208
- Despite the deliberately provocative comment above, there is a serious point, namely expanding the section on this controversy and covering religious reaction.
100 People Who Are Screwing Up America
How relevant is to mention this with regard to the specific episode? One would need a quite strong and particular link to offset the obvious NPOV potential bias and clear promotion of the non directly related commercial interest of the book writer.
I totally agree and changed the reference to make it at least more NPOV. In the end, I would vote for removal. Typewriter 16:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)