Talk:Typhoon Mireille: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:59, 17 January 2020

Typhoon Mireille has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 21, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Todo

More intro and impact. Jdorje 19:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added more impact and included inline references. I believe that this is no longer a stub now.

For a storm in 1991, it's still way too little information. It needs at least a few sentences (referenced) on preparations and aftermath. Cyclone biskit 21:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added what was in the TCR on preparations. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add in infomation from the JMA's best track - and do a search around some of the NMHSS as they will have decent reports from 1991. For example heres the HKO one from 1991.

Just makes start class now. Cyclone biskit 15:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Mireille/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 20:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink! I see that this article has been sitting here on the GAN list for almost 3 months now. So I'm going to be the person reviewing it.--12george1 (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Typhoon Mireille ,known in the Philippines as Typhoon Oniang" - Move that comma
"The typhoon first threatened Guam, although" - No love (wikilink) for Guam? :P
"A South Korean freighter rode out the storm at the port in Hakata Bay.[11] It breached along the breakwater, causing it to sink,[12] killing all 10 crew members.[1] The Japan Coast Guard launched a search and rescue mission for two days.[11]" - Why is this part not with the stuff for Japan?
Why is reference #1 titled "1992 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report" instead of "1991 Annual Tropical Cyclone Report"?

That's it--12george1 (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I took care of all of this. I left the SK freighter bit where it is because there is so much Japan info, and so little elsewhere. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A-class?

I was wondering what, if anything, is needed for this to be A-class? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:47, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone watching this? Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 22:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled upon this looking at how you used DT for post-1990 Japanese storms for my sandbox; Two year late reply, but I made a few slight tweaks to the impact; otherwise, it IMO is good to go for A class. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 08:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is missing stuff from Japanese newspapers on LexisNexis, which tbf requires one to be very shrewd with searching so I don’t blame you much. No A class until then though. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 14:22, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you could email them to me?! I want to do a retired typhoon GT. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:24, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I could add them myself and we can do an FAC together? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! I'm always up for collabs, especially if it means I don't have to do too much more. :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add this to my todo list and I'll ping you when I add such. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 20:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Oh how I like a little bit of revenge...

Is there anything that could be added from Jack Bevan?
Is there anything that could be added from RSMC Darwin Tropical Diagnostic Statements?
Is there anything that could be added from NCDC (Storm Events)?
Have you looked at full-blown copies of the Mariners Weather Logs that you cite?
The Mariner Weather Logs are available online via the Hathi Trust and should be linked to via the hdl feature.
Taiwan Impact via the CWB?
Phillippines Impact?

More later.Jason Rees (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Costliest typhoon?

There is no point in emphasizing that Hagibis has the largest absolute economic loss figure. Firstly you really needn't wait until Hagbis to find a typhoon that resulted in more damage in dollars than Mireille--Fitow in 2013 could well have surpassed that, and last year's Jebi definitely did. And Wikipedia's convention on such issue is measuring the loss in an inflation-adjusted fashion, as is always shown in the table below. 160.16.143.73 (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 == Costliest typhoon? ==
-There is no point in emphasizing that Hagibis has the largest absolute economic loss figure. Firstly you really needn't to wait until Hagbis to find a typhoon that resulted in more damage in dollars than Mireille--Fitow in 2013 could well have surpassed that, and last year's Jebi definitely did. And Wikipedia's convention on such issue is measuring the loss in an inflation-adjusted fashion, as is always shown in the table below.
+There is no point in emphasizing that Hagibis has the largest absolute economic loss figure. Firstly you really needn't wait until Hagbis to find a typhoon that resulted in more damage in dollars than Mireille--Fitow in 2013 could well have surpassed that, and last year's Jebi definitely did. And Wikipedia's convention on such issue is measuring the loss in an inflation-adjusted fashion, as is always shown in the table below.
 [[Special:Contributions/160.16.143.73|160.16.143.73]] ([[User talk:160.16.143.73|talk]]) 13:58, 17 January 2020 (UTC)