Jump to content

User talk:Erakura: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 58: Line 58:
I just linked it in. If u delete ur basically taking facts away. Do not be abusive and annoying. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LVtensen5980|LVtensen5980]] ([[User talk:LVtensen5980#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LVtensen5980|contribs]]) 02:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I just linked it in. If u delete ur basically taking facts away. Do not be abusive and annoying. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LVtensen5980|LVtensen5980]] ([[User talk:LVtensen5980#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LVtensen5980|contribs]]) 02:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{ping|LVtensen5980}} There is no need for that -- in no way have I been abusive or annoying. I have been respectful towards you, please consider extending me that same courtesy. Regardless, as I stated, if you have a conflict of interest, you need to bring it up on the article talk page rather than making the edit yourself. –[[User:Erakura|'''<span style="color:black">Erakura</span>''']][[User talk:Erakura|<sup><span style="color:darkgreen">(talk)</span></sup>]] 02:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|LVtensen5980}} There is no need for that -- in no way have I been abusive or annoying. I have been respectful towards you, please consider extending me that same courtesy. Regardless, as I stated, if you have a conflict of interest, you need to bring it up on the article talk page rather than making the edit yourself. –[[User:Erakura|'''<span style="color:black">Erakura</span>''']][[User talk:Erakura|<sup><span style="color:darkgreen">(talk)</span></sup>]] 02:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Literally just Linked the article. You still took it down. You have a problem. What a shame to Daniel Roth. Cant even read the article for facts. Shame.

Revision as of 02:49, 7 February 2020

Hi!

I don't know, I just create the article so that I can hear other people's opinions, other people's voices. I saw the company on the internet and I saw it for a long time ago, so that I decided to create the article to see where it is going.

If you want to delete it or fix it, I don't have any opinions, but if you have patience to wait for editors who clearly know the company better than me, wait for them to show the proof, or the evidence, give more time to work on it, I can see it more useful :) but the decision is yours.

If it didn't derserved as an article, then I see it how worth the company is.

Best regards

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, Belinrahs, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help.

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 14:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you've undergone a username change. See the above note about username changes. If you'd like your previous contributions to be credited to your new name, please drop me a note over at WP:STiki. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 02:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notification: ANI discussion

Hi Erakura, thank you very much for your AIV report. An ANI discussion has been opened about the issue at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Unauthorized_bot-like_editing. Feel free to comment. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops!

We may need to merge our AN3 reports. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonythedwarf: Thanks for letting me know -- I've dropped my report and commented on yours. –Erakura(talk) 03:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message from LVtensen5980

Hi Eu, if you google Daniel Roth SJX. Read the article. i actually know Mr Roth well. The info I put i is 100% True.

People need to know he is still around — Preceding unsigned comment added by LVtensen5980 (talkcontribs) 02:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LVtensen5980: If there is a reliable source indicating that your statements are true, then you would need to include it. However, if you personally know or have some relation with that individual, that is potentially a conflict of interest and you should not make those edits directly. Instead, leave a message on the article's Talk page and propose the change there (including a source!) –Erakura(talk) 02:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just linked it in. If u delete ur basically taking facts away. Do not be abusive and annoying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LVtensen5980 (talkcontribs) 02:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LVtensen5980: There is no need for that -- in no way have I been abusive or annoying. I have been respectful towards you, please consider extending me that same courtesy. Regardless, as I stated, if you have a conflict of interest, you need to bring it up on the article talk page rather than making the edit yourself. –Erakura(talk) 02:38, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Literally just Linked the article. You still took it down. You have a problem. What a shame to Daniel Roth. Cant even read the article for facts. Shame.