Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Leyes: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Praxidicae (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Hissamelriys (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep''' [[WP:ABF]] nomination from a SPA that has only 3 edits. [[User:Hissamelriys|Hissamelriys]] ([[User talk:Hissamelriys|talk]]) 20:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' [[WP:ABF]] nomination from a SPA that has only 3 edits. [[User:Hissamelriys|Hissamelriys]] ([[User talk:Hissamelriys|talk]]) 20:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Can you please clarify how ABF applies when the only comment here is only on content? Not to mention that ''I'' am clearly not an SPA and have pointed out policy specific reasons as to why it should be deleted? [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 20:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
:Can you please clarify how ABF applies when the only comment here is only on content? Not to mention that ''I'' am clearly not an SPA and have pointed out policy specific reasons as to why it should be deleted? [[User:Praxidicae|Praxidicae]] ([[User talk:Praxidicae|talk]]) 20:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
::If you think the article should be deleted then please nominate yourself. [[WP:ABF]] applies to the nominator only. It is sad that a "suspicious" SPA account can open a AfD and I have to prove why would a "new user" is not [[WP:ABF]]. [[User:Hissamelriys|Hissamelriys]] ([[User talk:Hissamelriys|talk]]) 20:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:22, 25 March 2020
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kevin Leyes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Leyes Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is lacking significant media mention in reliable source. Self profile link such as linkedin, forbes profile, YEC profile etc are used for citation. rest are non trivial mentions in reliable source. also the topic fails general notability guideline Below in the box (talk) 17:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know if the nom here is a sock or not and I wouldn't have come across this article if the creator hadn't triggered a filter, but I would've nommed it myself had I come across it otherwise. There is no in-depth coverage of Leyes, all the pieces included in the article are passing mentions, interviews, self written or otherwise not coverage and I can find no better sources. Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep WP:ABF nomination from a SPA that has only 3 edits. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Can you please clarify how ABF applies when the only comment here is only on content? Not to mention that I am clearly not an SPA and have pointed out policy specific reasons as to why it should be deleted? Praxidicae (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- If you think the article should be deleted then please nominate yourself. WP:ABF applies to the nominator only. It is sad that a "suspicious" SPA account can open a AfD and I have to prove why would a "new user" is not WP:ABF. Hissamelriys (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)