Talk:Airborne transmission: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Utonsal - "this article is nuts." |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject COVID-19|class=Start|importance=top}} |
|||
{{WPMED |class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
{{WPMED |class=Start|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Accelerated Composition (Patricia Fancher) | university = Clemson University | term = 2011 Q3 | project = }} |
{{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Accelerated Composition (Patricia Fancher) | university = Clemson University | term = 2011 Q3 | project = }} |
Revision as of 19:30, 2 April 2020
![]() | COVID-19 Start‑class Top‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Medicine Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
This article is irritating
This here states that "the virus is not considered airborne", although there it clearly means droplet transmission, which in this article is part of "airborne disease". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utonsal (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Droplet tranmission classified as airborne?
I am confused by this bit in the current version of this article:
1.
The relevant pathogens [...] may be spread through coughing, sneezing, raising of dust, spraying of liquids, or similar activities likely to generate aerosol particles or droplets.
See also the current version of a related [Transmission article]:
Also known as the respiratory route, and the resultant infection can be termed airborne disease. If an infected person coughs or sneezes on another person the microorganisms, suspended in warm, moist droplets, may enter the body through the nose, mouth or eye surfaces.
2. Now, according to the updated CDC guidelines (as of 27 OCT 2014) EVD (Ebola) is "droplet borne" (see my tracking of such changes in the official ebola epidemiologicial advice on my blog).
Taken together, do both 1 and 2 imply that "Ebola is airborne", a statement dreaded and ridiculed by many so far?
If not, we need to precise the wording of such Wikipedia articles, to split hairs and differentiate.
Zezen (talk) 08:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
See http://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/resources/glossary.html - specifically the last paragraph of the 'airborne transmission' definition.
2620:0:B60:3:187C:D34D:D348:2FD8 (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Airborne disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120628073116/http://www.nutramed.com/Air/airborne_diseases.htm to http://www.nutramed.com/Air/airborne_diseases.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)