Jump to content

Talk:Diana Frances: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requested move
 
Line 4: Line 4:


[[:Diana Frances (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Diana Francis}} – The dab page lists both people named ''Diana Franc'''i'''s'' and ''Diana Franc'''e'''s'', but there are more entries for the former, so the title should reflect that. Additionally, I'm also proposing that the redirect {{-r|Diana Frances}} be retargeted to the dab page. Currently, it's a redirect to [[Diana, Princess of Wales]]. She might be by far the most prominent person to have had this combination of what I take to be a given name and middle name, but she's not commonly known by that. I don't think it's very likely that a reader who's looking for Princess Diana will specifically choose to search by her given and middle names. The only other person who's an exact match is pretty obscure, but the redirect itself is obscure too, receiving hardly over a single hit each week. Retargeting the redirect will also reduce some of the hatnote overload at the Princess Diana article, which currently links to five dab pages. I'm also asking for the redirects's protection to be lifted – I don't see a reason to have any sort of protection, let alone a full one, for a page that has never received any sort of edits, disruptive or not. – [[User talk:Uanfala|Uanfala (talk)]] 17:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
[[:Diana Frances (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Diana Francis}} – The dab page lists both people named ''Diana Franc'''i'''s'' and ''Diana Franc'''e'''s'', but there are more entries for the former, so the title should reflect that. Additionally, I'm also proposing that the redirect {{-r|Diana Frances}} be retargeted to the dab page. Currently, it's a redirect to [[Diana, Princess of Wales]]. She might be by far the most prominent person to have had this combination of what I take to be a given name and middle name, but she's not commonly known by that. I don't think it's very likely that a reader who's looking for Princess Diana will specifically choose to search by her given and middle names. The only other person who's an exact match is pretty obscure, but the redirect itself is obscure too, receiving hardly over a single hit each week. Retargeting the redirect will also reduce some of the hatnote overload at the Princess Diana article, which currently links to five dab pages. I'm also asking for the redirects's protection to be lifted – I don't see a reason to have any sort of protection, let alone a full one, for a page that has never received any sort of edits, disruptive or not. – [[User talk:Uanfala|Uanfala (talk)]] 17:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

*'''Support''' all of the proposals. I don't know why [[Diana Franco]] was on the DAB page, since her article doesn't mention her being known as Francis or Frances: I removed the entry. [[Special:Contributions/62.165.227.156|62.165.227.156]] ([[User talk:62.165.227.156|talk]]) 00:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:10, 13 April 2020

Requested move 12 April 2020

Diana Frances (disambiguation)Diana Francis – The dab page lists both people named Diana Francis and Diana Frances, but there are more entries for the former, so the title should reflect that. Additionally, I'm also proposing that the redirect Diana Frances be retargeted to the dab page. Currently, it's a redirect to Diana, Princess of Wales. She might be by far the most prominent person to have had this combination of what I take to be a given name and middle name, but she's not commonly known by that. I don't think it's very likely that a reader who's looking for Princess Diana will specifically choose to search by her given and middle names. The only other person who's an exact match is pretty obscure, but the redirect itself is obscure too, receiving hardly over a single hit each week. Retargeting the redirect will also reduce some of the hatnote overload at the Princess Diana article, which currently links to five dab pages. I'm also asking for the redirects's protection to be lifted – I don't see a reason to have any sort of protection, let alone a full one, for a page that has never received any sort of edits, disruptive or not. – Uanfala (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]