Jump to content

Low technology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add link
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{confusion|Do it yourself|Low cost}}
{{multiple issues|
'''Low technology''', often abbreviated '''low tech''' (adjective forms '''low-technology''', '''low-tech''', '''lo-tech'''), is simple [[technology]], opposed to [[high technology]] or ''high-tech'' <ref name="climateforesight">{{cite web |title="Low-Tech is the new High-Tech"|author=Alexis Bernigaud |url=
{{Globalize|article|USA|2name=the United States|date=October 2016}}
https://www.climateforesight.eu/energy/low-tech-is-the-new-high-tech/|website= climateforesight.eu|accessdate=2020-04-16}}</ref>. They often refer to a traditional or non-mechanical kind, such as [[crafts]] and [[tool]]s that pre-date the [[Industrial Revolution]] <ref name="dico">{{cite web|language=english|title=Low tech definition|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/dictionnaire/anglais/low-tech|website=Cambridge International Dictionnary|date=|accessdate=2018-04-01}}</ref>.
{{no footnotes|date=October 2016}}
{{refimprove|date=October 2016}}
}}
'''Low technology''', often abbreviated '''low tech''' (adjective forms '''low-technology''', '''low-tech''', '''lo-tech'''), is simple [[technology]], often of a traditional or non-mechanical kind, such as [[crafts]] and [[tool]]s that pre-date the [[Industrial Revolution]]. It is the opposite of [[high technology]].


Low technology can simply be practised or fabricated with a minimum of [[capital (economics)|capital]] investment by an individual or small group of individuals. Also, the knowledge of the practice can be completely comprehended by a single individual, free from increasing [[Departmentalization|specialization]] and [[wikt:compartmentalization|compartmentalization]]. Low-tech techniques and designs may fall into disuse due to changing socio-economic conditions or priorities.
Low technology can simply be practiced or fabricated with a minimum of [[capital (economics)|capital]] investment by an individual or small group of individuals. Also, the knowledge of the practice can be completely comprehended by a single individual, free from increasing [[Departmentalization|specialization]] and [[wikt:compartmentalization|compartmentalization]]. In some definition, low-tech techniques and designs may fall into disuse due to changing socio-economic conditions or priorities. Overall, these technologies are easily fabricable, adaptable and reparable, and use little [[Energy_industry| energy]] and resources (that all come from local sources) to stay on the whole [[Environmentally_friendly| eco-friendly]]. <ref name="climateforesight"/>

Low-techs are present in [[everyday life]]. For example, [[bike| biking]] to work or [[repair| repairing]] your own [[Home_appliance devices]] instead of throwing them away corresponds to the ''low-tech'' philosophy.

==History==
=== Beginnings ===
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Primitive_technology| Primitive technologies] such as [[bushcraft]], tools that use [[wood]], [[stone]], [[whool]], etc. can be seen as ''low-tech'', as the pre-[[industrial revolution]] machines such as [[windmill]]s or [[sailboat]]s. <ref name="nolowhigh"> {{cite book|title= High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South |last1= Falk |first1= William W. |last2= Lyson |first2= Thomas A.| year=1988|isbn=9780887067297|publisher=SUNY Press |url=https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=hJPV8kFKSZgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22low+tech%22&ots=5O6LeLT4IG&sig=177E9G8Oqe1XY1vDicXbXdVPOs4#v=onepage&q=%22low%20tech%22&f=false}} </ref>

=== In the 70s ===

The [[Post–World_War_II_economic_expansion| economic boom]] after the war resulted in a doubt on progress, technology and infinite growth at the beginning of the 70s, notably with through the report [[The_Limits_to_Growth| The Limits to Growth]] (1972). Many have sought to define what soft technologies are, leading to the ''low-tech'' movement. Such technologies have been described as "intermediaries" ([[E.F. Schumacher]]) <ref name="schumacher">{{cite book|author1=Ernst Friedrich Schumacher|title=Small is beautiful : economics as if people mattered|publisher=HarperPerennia|date=2010|pages =324|isbn=978-0-06-199776-1|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=IKo3ALhVFKcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Small+is+beautiful&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio_ouXxfXoAhXxmOAKHVnBB5oQ6AEIODAC#v=onepage&q=Small%20is%20beautiful&f=false}}.</ref>, "liberating" ([[Murray_Bookchin|M. Bookchin]]) <ref name="bookchin">{{cite book|language=english|author1=Murray Bookchin|title=Post-Scarcity Anarchism|publisher=Ramparts Press|date=1971|pages=288|isbn=|url=https://libcom.org/files/Post-Scarcity%20Anarchism%20-%20Murray%20Bookchin.pdf}}</ref>, or even [[democratic]]. Thus, a philosophy of advocating a widespread use of soft technologies was developed in the United States, and many studies were carried out in those years, in particular by researchers like [[Langdon Winner]] <ref name="Winner2016">{{cite journal|last1=Winner|first1=Langdon|title=Mythinformation in the high-tech era|journal=Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society|volume=4|issue=6|year=2016|pages=582–596|issn=0270-4676|doi=10.1177/027046768400400609}}</ref>.

=== 2000s and later ===
"Low-tech" has been more and more employed in the scientific writings, in particular in the analyzes of the work from some authors of the 1970s: see for example Hirsch ‐ Kreinsen <ref name="Hirsch‐Kreinsen2008">{{article|nom1=Hirsch‐Kreinsen|prénom1=Hartmut|titre=“Low‐Tech” Innovations|journal=Industry and Innovation|volume=15|numéro=1|année=2008|pages=19–43|issn=1366-2716|doi=10.1080/13662710701850691}}</ref>, the book "High tech, low tech, no tech" <ref name="nolowhigh"/> or Gordon <ref name="Gordon2009">{{article|nom1=Gordon|prénom1=Uri|titre=ANARCHISM AND THE POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY|journal=WorkingUSA|volume=12|numéro=3|année=2009|pages=489–503|issn=1089-7011|doi=10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00250.x}}</ref>.

More recently, the perspective of resource scarcity <ref name="heinberg">{{cite book|language=english|author1=Richard Heinberg|title=Peak Everything - Waking Up in the Century of Decline |publisher=Ramparts Press|date=2007|pages=|isbn=978-0-86571-598-1|url=https://books.google.ca/books?id=4uHXSxynE0sC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Peak+Everything+-+Waking+Up+in+the+Century+of+Decline&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9_-f9x_XoAhVFdt8KHbIdB2wQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Peak%20Everything%20-%20Waking%20Up%20in%20the%20Century%20of%20Decline&f=false}}</ref> - especially minerals - lead to an increasingly severe criticism on [[high-tech]]s and technology.

Since 2007, the Dutch Kris de Decker has published (with his collaborators) some reflections on low-tech solutions, the problem of high-techs, and the updating of technologies supposedly "obsolete" via the "[https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/ Low <-tech Magazine]". The header is: "Doubts on progress and technology", and specifies that the lowtechs "refuse to assume that each problem has a high-tech solution" <ref name="ltmag">{{cite web |title=Low-Tech Magazine|author = Kris de Decker|url=https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/|site=lowtechmagazine.com|date=|accessdate=2020-04-06}}</ref> , with a progressive translation of the articles in other languages since recently.

In 2014, the french engineer Philippe Bihouix published "L'âge des low tech" (The age of low-techs) where he presents how a european nation like [[France]], with little mineral and energy resources, could become a "low-tech" nation (instead of a "start-up" nation) to better correspond to the [[sustainable development]] goals of such nation <ref name="bihouix2014">{{cite book|language=french|author1=Philippe Bihouix|title=L'âge des low tech|publisher=Editions du Seuil|date=2014|pages=330|isbn=978-2-02-116072-7|url=https://www.seuil.com/ouvrage/l-age-des-low-tech-philippe-bihouix/9782021160727}}</ref>. He cites various examples of low-techs initiative and describe the low-tech philosophy and principles. In 2015, the [[Low-tech Lab| https://lowtechlab.org/en]] project opened, consisting in a low-tech web platform for documentation and free sharing ('wiki' type) of inventions, and to put forward reflections on the ''low-tech'' philosophy.


==Examples of low technology==
==Examples of low technology==
Line 59: Line 75:
==See also==
==See also==
* [[Obsolescence]]
* [[Obsolescence]]
* [[Do it yourself]]
* [[Anti-consumerism]]
* [[Degrowth]]
* [[Simple_living|Simple living]]
* [[Embodied_energy|Embodied energy]]

==Sources==

* {{cite book|title= High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South |last1= Falk |first1= William W. |last2= Lyson |first2= Thomas A.| year=1988|isbn=9780887067297|publisher=SUNY Press |url=https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=hJPV8kFKSZgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22low+tech%22&ots=5O6LeLT4IG&sig=177E9G8Oqe1XY1vDicXbXdVPOs4#v=onepage&q=%22low%20tech%22&f=false}}

* {{cite book|language=english|title= Low-tech magazine (tome 1 and 2) |first1= Kris |last1= De Decker | year=2012 |isbn=9781794711525|publisher= |url=https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2019/12/the-printed-website-is-complete.html}}

* {{cite book|language=english|title= Lo—TEK. Design by Radical Indigenism |last1= Watson |first1= Julia| year=2020|isbn=978-3836578189|publisher=Taschen |url=https://www.taschen.com/pages/en/catalogue/architecture/all/04698/facts.julia_watson_lotek_design_by_radical_indigenism.htm}}


==References==
==References==
Line 68: Line 97:
==External links==
==External links==
* [https://www.lowtechmagazine.com/ Low-Tech Magazine – Doubts on progress and technology]
* [https://www.lowtechmagazine.com/ Low-Tech Magazine – Doubts on progress and technology]
* [https://lowtechlab.org/en Low-tech lab (english version)]


{{simple life}}
{{History of technology}}
{{History of technology}}


[[Category:Technology by type]]
[[Category:Technology by type]]
[[Category:Design]]
[[Category:Design]]
[[Category:Simple living]]
[[Category:Simple_living]]

Revision as of 23:01, 19 April 2020

Low technology, often abbreviated low tech (adjective forms low-technology, low-tech, lo-tech), is simple technology, opposed to high technology or high-tech [1]. They often refer to a traditional or non-mechanical kind, such as crafts and tools that pre-date the Industrial Revolution [2].

Low technology can simply be practiced or fabricated with a minimum of capital investment by an individual or small group of individuals. Also, the knowledge of the practice can be completely comprehended by a single individual, free from increasing specialization and compartmentalization. In some definition, low-tech techniques and designs may fall into disuse due to changing socio-economic conditions or priorities. Overall, these technologies are easily fabricable, adaptable and reparable, and use little energy and resources (that all come from local sources) to stay on the whole eco-friendly. [1]

Low-techs are present in everyday life. For example, biking to work or repairing your own Home_appliance devices instead of throwing them away corresponds to the low-tech philosophy.

History

Beginnings

Primitive technologies such as bushcraft, tools that use wood, stone, whool, etc. can be seen as low-tech, as the pre-industrial revolution machines such as windmills or sailboats. [3]

In the 70s

The economic boom after the war resulted in a doubt on progress, technology and infinite growth at the beginning of the 70s, notably with through the report The Limits to Growth (1972). Many have sought to define what soft technologies are, leading to the low-tech movement. Such technologies have been described as "intermediaries" (E.F. Schumacher) [4], "liberating" (M. Bookchin) [5], or even democratic. Thus, a philosophy of advocating a widespread use of soft technologies was developed in the United States, and many studies were carried out in those years, in particular by researchers like Langdon Winner [6].

2000s and later

"Low-tech" has been more and more employed in the scientific writings, in particular in the analyzes of the work from some authors of the 1970s: see for example Hirsch ‐ Kreinsen [7], the book "High tech, low tech, no tech" [3] or Gordon [8].

More recently, the perspective of resource scarcity [9] - especially minerals - lead to an increasingly severe criticism on high-techs and technology.

Since 2007, the Dutch Kris de Decker has published (with his collaborators) some reflections on low-tech solutions, the problem of high-techs, and the updating of technologies supposedly "obsolete" via the "Low <-tech Magazine". The header is: "Doubts on progress and technology", and specifies that the lowtechs "refuse to assume that each problem has a high-tech solution" [10] , with a progressive translation of the articles in other languages since recently.

In 2014, the french engineer Philippe Bihouix published "L'âge des low tech" (The age of low-techs) where he presents how a european nation like France, with little mineral and energy resources, could become a "low-tech" nation (instead of a "start-up" nation) to better correspond to the sustainable development goals of such nation [11]. He cites various examples of low-techs initiative and describe the low-tech philosophy and principles. In 2015, the https://lowtechlab.org/en project opened, consisting in a low-tech web platform for documentation and free sharing ('wiki' type) of inventions, and to put forward reflections on the low-tech philosophy.

Examples of low technology

Note: almost all of the entries in this section should be prefixed by the word traditional.

(Wright is the agent form of the word wrought, which itself is the original past passive participle of the word work, now superseded by the weak verb forms worker and worked respectively.)

Note: home canning is a counter example of a low technology since some of the supplies needed to pursue this skill rely on a global trade network and an existing manufacturing infrastructure.[citation needed]

By federal law in the United States, only those articles produced with little or no use of machinery or tools with complex mechanisms may be stamped with the designation "hand-wrought" or "hand-made". Lengthy court-battles are currently underway over the precise definition of the terms "organic" and "natural" as applied to foodstuffs.[citation needed]

Groups associated with low-technology

See also

Sources

  • Falk, William W.; Lyson, Thomas A. (1988). High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780887067297.

References

  1. ^ a b Alexis Bernigaud. ""Low-Tech is the new High-Tech"". climateforesight.eu. Retrieved 2020-04-16.
  2. ^ "Low tech definition". Cambridge International Dictionnary. Retrieved 2018-04-01.
  3. ^ a b Falk, William W.; Lyson, Thomas A. (1988). High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780887067297.
  4. ^ Ernst Friedrich Schumacher (2010). Small is beautiful : economics as if people mattered. HarperPerennia. p. 324. ISBN 978-0-06-199776-1..
  5. ^ Murray Bookchin (1971). Post-Scarcity Anarchism (PDF). Ramparts Press. p. 288.
  6. ^ Winner, Langdon (2016). "Mythinformation in the high-tech era". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 4 (6): 582–596. doi:10.1177/027046768400400609. ISSN 0270-4676.
  7. ^ Article ([[Special:EditPage/{{{1}}}|edit]] | [[Talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] | [[Special:PageHistory/{{{1}}}|history]] | [[Special:ProtectPage/{{{1}}}|protect]] | [[Special:DeletePage/{{{1}}}|delete]] | [{{fullurl:Special:WhatLinksHere/{{{1}}}|limit=999}} links] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=watch}} watch] | logs | views)
  8. ^ Article ([[Special:EditPage/{{{1}}}|edit]] | [[Talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] | [[Special:PageHistory/{{{1}}}|history]] | [[Special:ProtectPage/{{{1}}}|protect]] | [[Special:DeletePage/{{{1}}}|delete]] | [{{fullurl:Special:WhatLinksHere/{{{1}}}|limit=999}} links] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=watch}} watch] | logs | views)
  9. ^ Richard Heinberg (2007). Peak Everything - Waking Up in the Century of Decline. Ramparts Press. ISBN 978-0-86571-598-1.
  10. ^ Kris de Decker. "Low-Tech Magazine". Retrieved 2020-04-06. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |site= ignored (help)
  11. ^ Philippe Bihouix (2014). L'âge des low tech (in French). Editions du Seuil. p. 330. ISBN 978-2-02-116072-7.
General