Low technology: Difference between revisions
BP-Aegirsson (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
BP-Aegirsson (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==History== |
==History== |
||
=== |
=== Historical origin === |
||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Primitive_technology| Primitive technologies] such as [[bushcraft]], tools that use [[wood]], [[stone]], [[whool]], etc. can be seen as ''low-tech'', as the pre-[[industrial revolution]] machines such as [[windmill]]s or [[sailboat]]s. <ref name="nolowhigh"> {{cite book|title= High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South |last1= Falk |first1= William W. |last2= Lyson |first2= Thomas A.| year=1988|isbn=9780887067297|publisher=SUNY Press |url=https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=hJPV8kFKSZgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22low+tech%22&ots=5O6LeLT4IG&sig=177E9G8Oqe1XY1vDicXbXdVPOs4#v=onepage&q=%22low%20tech%22&f=false}} </ref> |
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Primitive_technology| Primitive technologies] such as [[bushcraft]], tools that use [[wood]], [[stone]], [[whool]], etc. can be seen as ''low-tech'', as the pre-[[industrial revolution]] machines such as [[windmill]]s or [[sailboat]]s. <ref name="nolowhigh"> {{cite book|title= High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South |last1= Falk |first1= William W. |last2= Lyson |first2= Thomas A.| year=1988|isbn=9780887067297|publisher=SUNY Press |url=https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=hJPV8kFKSZgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22low+tech%22&ots=5O6LeLT4IG&sig=177E9G8Oqe1XY1vDicXbXdVPOs4#v=onepage&q=%22low%20tech%22&f=false}} </ref> |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
In 2014, the french engineer Philippe Bihouix published "L'âge des low tech" (The age of low-techs) where he presents how a european nation like [[France]], with little mineral and energy resources, could become a "low-tech" nation (instead of a "start-up" nation) to better correspond to the [[sustainable development]] goals of such nation <ref name="bihouix2014">{{cite book|language=french|author1=Philippe Bihouix|title=L'âge des low tech|publisher=Editions du Seuil|date=2014|pages=330|isbn=978-2-02-116072-7|url=https://www.seuil.com/ouvrage/l-age-des-low-tech-philippe-bihouix/9782021160727}}</ref>. He cites various examples of low-techs initiative and describe the low-tech philosophy and principles. In 2015, the [https://lowtechlab.org/en| Low-tech Lab] project opened, consisting in a low-tech web platform for documentation and free sharing ('wiki' type) of inventions, and to put forward reflections on the ''low-tech'' philosophy. |
In 2014, the french engineer Philippe Bihouix published "L'âge des low tech" (The age of low-techs) where he presents how a european nation like [[France]], with little mineral and energy resources, could become a "low-tech" nation (instead of a "start-up" nation) to better correspond to the [[sustainable development]] goals of such nation <ref name="bihouix2014">{{cite book|language=french|author1=Philippe Bihouix|title=L'âge des low tech|publisher=Editions du Seuil|date=2014|pages=330|isbn=978-2-02-116072-7|url=https://www.seuil.com/ouvrage/l-age-des-low-tech-philippe-bihouix/9782021160727}}</ref>. He cites various examples of low-techs initiative and describe the low-tech philosophy and principles. In 2015, the [https://lowtechlab.org/en| Low-tech Lab] project opened, consisting in a low-tech web platform for documentation and free sharing ('wiki' type) of inventions, and to put forward reflections on the ''low-tech'' philosophy. |
||
==Many definitions== |
|||
===Binary definition=== |
|||
According to the ''Cambridge International Dictionary of English'', the concept of low-tech is simply defined as a technique that is not recent, or using old [[material]]s <ref name="dico"/>. Companies that are considered ''low-tech'' have a simple operation. The less sophisticated an object, the more low-tech. They are sometimes even assimilated to [[archaic]] methods. This definition does not take into account the [[ecological]] or [[social]] aspect, as it is only based on a simplistic definition of low-tech philosophy. The low-techs would then be seen as a "step backwards", and not as possible [[innovation]]. |
|||
Also, with this definition, the "[[high-tech]]" (ex: the [[telegraph]]) of a certain era becomes the "low-tech" of the one after (ex: compared to the [[telephone]]). |
|||
===Technocriticists=== |
|||
{{main|Technocriticism}} |
|||
Low-tech is sometimes described as an "anti [[high-tech]]" movement, as a deliberate renunciation of a complicated and expensive [[technology]]. This kind of protest [[Social_movement|movement]] criticizes any disproportionate [[technology]]: a comparison with the [[Neo-Luddism|neo-luddic]] or [[Technocriticism| technocritical]] [[Social_movement|movement]]s, which appeared since the [[Industrial Revolution]], is then possible. This critical part of the ''low-tech'' movement can be called "no-tech", see for instance "[https://www.notechmagazine.com/2016/07/no-tech-reader-7.html| No-tech magazine]". |
|||
===Recently: a wider and more balanced approach=== |
|||
A second, more nuanced definition of low-tech may appear. This definition takes into account the [[philosophy| philosophical]], [[eco-friendly|environmental]] and [[social]] aspects. Low-tech are no longer restricted to old [[technique]]s, but also extended to new, future-oriented techniques, more [[eco-friendly |ecological]] and intended to recreate [[social]] bounds. A low-tech innovation is then possible <ref name="bihouix"/>. |
|||
Contrary to the first definition, this one is much more [[optimistic]] and has a [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/positive#Adjective| positive] connotation. It would then oppose the [[planned obsolescence]] of objects (often “[[high-tech]]”) and question the [[consumer society]], as well as the [[materialist]] principles underneath. With this definition, the concept of ''low-tech'' thus implies that anyone could make objects using their intelligence, and share their [[know-how]] to popularize their creations. A low-tech must therefore be [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/accessible#Adjective| accessible] to all, and could therefore help in reduction of [[Economic_inequality| inequalities]] <ref name="bihouix"/>. |
|||
Furthermore, some reduce the definition of low-tech to meet basic needs (eating, drinking, housing, heating ...), which disqualifies many technologies from the definition of low-techs, but this definition does not is not always accepted <ref name="GrimaudTastevin2017">{{cite journal|last1=Grimaud|first1=Emmanuel|last2=Tastevin|first2=Yann Philippe|last3=Vidal|first3=Denis|journal=Techniques & culture|language=french|issue=67|year=2017|title=Low-tech ? Wild-Tech !|issn=0248-6016|doi=10.4000/tc.8260}}</ref> |
|||
. Finally, considering that the definition of low-tech is relative, some prefer to use ''lower tech'' <ref name="bihouix"/>, to emphasize a higher sobriety compared to [[high-tech]], without claiming to be perfectly "low". |
|||
==Examples of low technology== |
==Examples of low technology== |
Revision as of 15:21, 20 April 2020
Low technology, often abbreviated low tech (adjective forms low-technology, low-tech, lo-tech), is simple technology, opposed to high technology or high-tech [1]. They often refer to a traditional or non-mechanical kind, such as crafts and tools that pre-date the Industrial Revolution [2].
Low technology can simply be practiced or fabricated with a minimum of capital investment by an individual or small group of individuals. Also, the knowledge of the practice can be completely comprehended by a single individual, free from increasing specialization and compartmentalization. In some definition, low-tech techniques and designs may fall into disuse due to changing socio-economic conditions or priorities. Overall, these technologies are easily fabricable, adaptable and reparable, and use little energy and resources (that all come from local sources) to stay on the whole eco-friendly. [1]
Low-techs are present in everyday life. For example, biking to work or repairing your own devices instead of throwing them away corresponds to the low-tech philosophy.
History
Historical origin
Primitive technologies such as bushcraft, tools that use wood, stone, whool, etc. can be seen as low-tech, as the pre-industrial revolution machines such as windmills or sailboats. [3]
In the 70s
The economic boom after the war resulted in a doubt on progress, technology and infinite growth at the beginning of the 70s, notably with through the report The Limits to Growth (1972). Many have sought to define what soft technologies are, leading to the low-tech movement. Such technologies have been described as "intermediaries" (E.F. Schumacher) [4], "liberating" (M. Bookchin) [5], or even democratic. Thus, a philosophy of advocating a widespread use of soft technologies was developed in the United States, and many studies were carried out in those years, in particular by researchers like Langdon Winner [6].
2000s and later
"Low-tech" has been more and more employed in the scientific writings, in particular in the analyzes of the work from some authors of the 1970s: see for example Hirsch ‐ Kreinsen [7], the book "High tech, low tech, no tech" [3] or Gordon [8].
More recently, the perspective of resource scarcity [9] - especially minerals - lead to an increasingly severe criticism on high-techs and technology.
Since 2007, the Dutch Kris de Decker has published (with his collaborators) some reflections on low-tech solutions, the problem of high-techs, and the updating of technologies supposedly "obsolete" via the "Low <-tech Magazine". The header is: "Doubts on progress and technology", and specifies that the lowtechs "refuse to assume that each problem has a high-tech solution" [10] , with a progressive translation of the articles in other languages since recently.
In 2014, the french engineer Philippe Bihouix published "L'âge des low tech" (The age of low-techs) where he presents how a european nation like France, with little mineral and energy resources, could become a "low-tech" nation (instead of a "start-up" nation) to better correspond to the sustainable development goals of such nation [11]. He cites various examples of low-techs initiative and describe the low-tech philosophy and principles. In 2015, the Low-tech Lab project opened, consisting in a low-tech web platform for documentation and free sharing ('wiki' type) of inventions, and to put forward reflections on the low-tech philosophy.
Many definitions
Binary definition
According to the Cambridge International Dictionary of English, the concept of low-tech is simply defined as a technique that is not recent, or using old materials [2]. Companies that are considered low-tech have a simple operation. The less sophisticated an object, the more low-tech. They are sometimes even assimilated to archaic methods. This definition does not take into account the ecological or social aspect, as it is only based on a simplistic definition of low-tech philosophy. The low-techs would then be seen as a "step backwards", and not as possible innovation.
Also, with this definition, the "high-tech" (ex: the telegraph) of a certain era becomes the "low-tech" of the one after (ex: compared to the telephone).
Technocriticists
Low-tech is sometimes described as an "anti high-tech" movement, as a deliberate renunciation of a complicated and expensive technology. This kind of protest movement criticizes any disproportionate technology: a comparison with the neo-luddic or technocritical movements, which appeared since the Industrial Revolution, is then possible. This critical part of the low-tech movement can be called "no-tech", see for instance "No-tech magazine".
Recently: a wider and more balanced approach
A second, more nuanced definition of low-tech may appear. This definition takes into account the philosophical, environmental and social aspects. Low-tech are no longer restricted to old techniques, but also extended to new, future-oriented techniques, more ecological and intended to recreate social bounds. A low-tech innovation is then possible [12].
Contrary to the first definition, this one is much more optimistic and has a positive connotation. It would then oppose the planned obsolescence of objects (often “high-tech”) and question the consumer society, as well as the materialist principles underneath. With this definition, the concept of low-tech thus implies that anyone could make objects using their intelligence, and share their know-how to popularize their creations. A low-tech must therefore be accessible to all, and could therefore help in reduction of inequalities [12].
Furthermore, some reduce the definition of low-tech to meet basic needs (eating, drinking, housing, heating ...), which disqualifies many technologies from the definition of low-techs, but this definition does not is not always accepted [13] . Finally, considering that the definition of low-tech is relative, some prefer to use lower tech [12], to emphasize a higher sobriety compared to high-tech, without claiming to be perfectly "low".
Examples of low technology
Note: almost all of the entries in this section should be prefixed by the word traditional.
- weaving produced on non-automated looms, and basketry.
- hand wood-working, joinery, coopering, and carpentry.
- the trade of the ship-wright.
- the trade of the wheel-wright.
- the trade of the wainwright: making wagons. (the Latin word for a two-wheeled wagon is carpentum, the maker of which was a carpenter.)
(Wright is the agent form of the word wrought, which itself is the original past passive participle of the word work, now superseded by the weak verb forms worker and worked respectively.)
- blacksmithing and the various related smithing and metal-crafts.
- folk music played on acoustic instruments.
- mathematics (particularly, pure mathematics)
- organic farming and animal husbandry (i.e.; agriculture as practiced by all American farmers prior to World War II).
- milling in the sense of operating hand-constructed equipment with the intent to either grind grain, or the reduction of timber to lumber as practiced in a saw-mill.
- fulling, felting, drop spindle spinning, hand knitting, crochet, & similar textile preparation.
- the production of charcoal by the collier, for use in home heating, foundry operations, smelting, the various smithing trades, and for brushing ones teeth as in Colonial America.
- glass-blowing.
- various subskills of food preservation:
Note: home canning is a counter example of a low technology since some of the supplies needed to pursue this skill rely on a global trade network and an existing manufacturing infrastructure.[citation needed]
- the production of various alcoholic beverages:
- flint-knapping
- masonry as used in castles, cathedrals, and root cellars.
Legal status of low-technology
By federal law in the United States, only those articles produced with little or no use of machinery or tools with complex mechanisms may be stamped with the designation "hand-wrought" or "hand-made". Lengthy court-battles are currently underway over the precise definition of the terms "organic" and "natural" as applied to foodstuffs.[citation needed]
Groups associated with low-technology
- Arts and Crafts Movement, popularized by Gustav Stickley in America around 1900.
- Bauhaus movement of Germany around the same time.
- Do-It-Yourself phenomenon arising in America following World War II.
- Back-to-the-land movement beginning in America during the 1960s.
- Luddites, whose activities date to the very beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
- Living history and open-air museums around the world, which strives to recreate bygone societies.
- Simple living adherents, such as the Amish and to a lesser extent some sects of the Mennonites, who specifically refuse some newer technologies to avoid undesirable effects on themselves or their societies.
- Survivalists are often proponents,[citation needed] since low-technology is inherently more robust than its high-technology counterpart.
See also
Sources
- Falk, William W.; Lyson, Thomas A. (1988). High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780887067297.
- De Decker, Kris (2012). Low-tech magazine (tome 1 and 2). ISBN 9781794711525.
- Watson, Julia (2020). Lo—TEK. Design by Radical Indigenism. Taschen. ISBN 978-3836578189.
References
- ^ a b Alexis Bernigaud. ""Low-Tech is the new High-Tech"". climateforesight.eu. Retrieved 2020-04-16.
- ^ a b "Low tech definition". Cambridge International Dictionnary. Retrieved 2018-04-01.
- ^ a b Falk, William W.; Lyson, Thomas A. (1988). High tech, low tech, no tech: recent industrial and occupational change in the South. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780887067297.
- ^ Ernst Friedrich Schumacher (2010). Small is beautiful : economics as if people mattered. HarperPerennia. p. 324. ISBN 978-0-06-199776-1..
- ^ Murray Bookchin (1971). Post-Scarcity Anarchism (PDF). Ramparts Press. p. 288.
- ^ Winner, Langdon (2016). "Mythinformation in the high-tech era". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 4 (6): 582–596. doi:10.1177/027046768400400609. ISSN 0270-4676.
- ^ Hirsch‐Kreinsen, Hartmut (2008). ""Low‐Tech" Innovations". Industry and Innovation. 15 (1): 19–43. doi:10.1080/13662710701850691. ISSN 1366-2716.
- ^ Gordon, Uri (2009). "ANARCHISM AND THE POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY". WorkingUSA. 12 (3): 489–503. doi:10.1111/j.1743-4580.2009.00250.x. ISSN 1089-7011.
- ^ Richard Heinberg (2007). Peak Everything - Waking Up in the Century of Decline. Ramparts Press. ISBN 978-0-86571-598-1.
- ^ Kris de Decker. "Low-Tech Magazine". lowtechmagazine.com. Retrieved 2020-04-06.
- ^ Philippe Bihouix (2014). L'âge des low tech (in French). Editions du Seuil. p. 330. ISBN 978-2-02-116072-7.
- ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference
bihouix
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Grimaud, Emmanuel; Tastevin, Yann Philippe; Vidal, Denis (2017). "Low-tech ? Wild-Tech !". Techniques & culture (in French) (67). doi:10.4000/tc.8260. ISSN 0248-6016.
- General